no, the ports wont line up. do a search on hybrid swaps and you will find everything you need.

 

no, the ports wont line up. do a search on hybrid swaps and you will find everything you need.

Does the 2.8 intake bolt pattern match the 3.4 aluminum heads to where I could just modify the ports to match or is the bolt pattern and ports just to far off alignment. Thanks.

 

Thanks again for the help on this subject, now I can start my swap.

 

so is this what the guy with the bad ass syborg s10 do, a hybrid 3.4 v6?? wow i'm new to this, are they better than a v8 swap can someone point me in the right direction for more info, doing a hybrid swap search now. . .

 

yeah the search didnt help much

 

no the syborg guy has a twin turbo 4.3l engine

 

The hybrid swap is great if you want more power and still have plenty of room under the hood.

 

seems pretty cool, fug it though i got a v8 already waitin lol

 

This hybred upgrade takes the aluminum heads, upper intake, and plentium off a '99 grand am and matches that up with the 3.4L from a '93-95 block assembly.

 

go to fullthrottlev6.com that have everythinf you need to no on head swaps and on the 60 degree v6

 

i have a 3.4l in my first gen and i have ported 3400 cast heads

 

Those are not 3400 heads in that picture. Those are still genI iron heads. :2far:

 

Just curious, what would a short block 3.4L run? I wanna start banking pennies for one.

 

i paid 500 for mine with 33k on the clock back in 05, let me see if i can find the site...

edit: here it is... http://www.tacreationsusa.com/v6.htm great guys to deal with!

 

That sounds good, but I doubt I'd find a '93-95 camaro/FB 3.4L that has that few of miles on it around here.

What I'm looking to get advice on is, how much it would be for a rebuilt "short block". From there I'll install the heads, upper, ect.

Just to make sure I'm on the right page with this. A short block is a rebuilt block, cam, pistons. They buyer needs to install the oil pump, heads, and uppper...ect.

 

o, well im going off what my bro is telling me, i no its out of a 95 car

 

'95 F-body is a 4th gen. The engine is still a genI 660 though.

 

Here's a write up about it. For those that are interested.

http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4706

It certainly has my interest!

Best of luck!

Jax

 

Why wouldnt you want to run the sfi on your 3.4 the tbi wont line up any way and even if it did it woludnt run right,the sfi set up will give you the power your looking for that manafold is way better.Its worth going trough the trouble.You just need the wireing harness off a camaro.

 

SFI does not make any more power than batch or TBI.

I'll say again.

SFI does NOT make any more power than batch fire or TBI.

SFI, in stock form is only enabled below 3000 RPM, where it reverts back to batch fire, since there isn't enough time to fire the injectors sequentialy at around the 3000 RPM range, and supply enough fuel.

SFI is only used for emissions, and lower fuel consumption.

The 3.4 SFI intake is terrible for flow. The "plenum" is tiny, because the casting is thick, si it'd not a "great" intake.

You also need much more than just the harness from the F-body, you will also need the ECM, but I would expect that to be assumed as part of the "harness", and either the stock VATs module and matching ignition switch, or resistor value. Another option would be to construct a module that mimicks the connection between the VATs module and PCM, there are plans for it on the interweebnetz. I also believe that you may be able to buy the module already constructed.

If I wanted to change from TBI to a multi point injection system I would use a '7730 or '7749 ECM, and a matching program to the way the engine will be used (S_AUJP for N/A, code59 for forced induction), and run in batch fire mode. There is lots of documentation for these ECMs and programs for tuning and other modifications. The 3.4 SFI PCM has not been hacked, and has just about no tuning support available.