Style | A | B | C | D | E |
All (except Corvette and LS1) | 30 3/4 in. | 21 3/4 in. | 23 3/16 in. | 3 3/4 in. | 18 1/4 in. |
Corvette transaxle | | | | N/A | N/A |
LS1 Style (1998 and Later) | 31 5/32 in. | 21 3/4 in. | 23 19/32 in. | 3 3/4 in. | 18 1/4 in. |
people always think they need dual exhaust for performance.dual exhaust setups.
I'm running a single exhaust on my LS10 swap.Good Info that's what my understanding was before I had doubts. All these guys using aftermarket crossmembers got me thinking that I needed to buy something else but most were 2.2 trucks and dual exhaust setups. Being a 2dr blazer it is not practical and in some ways not safe to run dual exhaust. IE drivers side to close to gas tank. Now I just need to settle on a good quite single exhaust setup. Open for suggestions.
Thanks
Yes it is louder than I expected, right now it will be ok . After driving a while I may change my mind and have a couple of resonators put on. the thing that's bugging me more is the noise from the valve train coming through the dash...Stock-ish muffler ? To loud I take it? I read a thread where Philnix used a magnaflow and the finish off with a Spin Tech. I was toeing with the idea of something like that. Basically a resonator at the end of the system. Said it was quite. Also thought about the stock fullsize truck muffler.
I just reread this, and it made me think. A friend of mine bought a 5.3L swapped Blazer with what looks like CPW motor mounts. The NVH was really surprising, and has me rethinking my motor mounts. Is this part of your issue?the thing that's bugging me more is the noise from the valve train coming through the dash...
I'm using Holley mounts pads and 2002 Camaro Motor Mounts. Steering wheel is smooth as glass so it's not a vibration thing. What is the acronym NVH?? I'm not familiar with that.I just reread this, and it made me think. A friend of mine bought a 5.3L swapped Blazer with what looks like CPW motor mounts. The NVH was really surprising, and has me rethinking my motor mounts. Is this part of your issue?
I'm no expert either. It doesn't effect the tune per say, just some of the parameters on the how you go about it. For example DBC has an IAC motor, DBW does not. So how you go about the tuning parameters is slightly different. Some of the data logging uses different channels too.I'm far from an expert on these things, but I don't understand how DBW would effect the tune. The timing and fuel tables would be the same, wouldn't they?
My LS4 GXP and 2500 HD LQ4 have no noticeable valve train noise. Haven't had my LQ9 S10 running long enough to tell, yet.
I had the same issue on my Blazer when I first got it on the road. I was originally using a base tune from an automatic - my truck is a manual - so there were some tables that were expecting a torque converter causing me some grief. Once I switched to a manual base tune it made a huge difference.I'm using Holley mounts pads and 2002 Camaro Motor Mounts. Steering wheel is smooth as glass so it's not a vibration thing. What is the acronym NVH?? I'm not familiar with that.
I have only driven it to and from the exhaust shop. It just seems very noisy from behind the dash board. It seems like valve train noise.
I have some Idle tuning to do before I can drive it more. Once it reaches about 150 or so it starts dying out as you pull up to stops. I have it commanded to idle at 750rpm. I think the Idle airflow or VE tables are wrong for the cam. I'm running DBW and all the tuning info & video's are geared toward DBC systems.
I'm running a LM4 block & crank with gen 4 flat top pistons. 243 heads on top, esentially making it an L33 engine assembly. The tune file is from a 2005 Silverado L33. i tried to match things to the best if my knowlwdge at the time. Tuning was not in my knowlege base at that time. I'm still a novice & learning...I had the same issue on my Blazer when I first got it on the road. I was originally using a base tune from an automatic - my truck is a manual - so there were some tables that were expecting a torque converter causing me some grief. Once I switched to a manual base tune it made a huge difference.
I'm a big proponent of getting the correct base segments loaded into the PCM before performing any tuning. I'm not sure if you've looked into segment swapping, but it essentially allows you to grab the exact engine, trans, vehicle, etc from the factory tune files and merge them into one. On my Blazer I started with a 2003 Blazer, merged it with a L59 5.3 from a truck and a Z06 T56 segment. Fixed a bunch of issues including the idle dying at stops. There are lots of tables to deal and even some hidden the segments include everything.
start with the idle tuning (Base Running Airflow) in park and drive from dead cold to 210 degrees. It takes 2 days to do that correctly. Alice took 14 minutes to go from 42 degrees to 210. Clifford (a basically stock truck) took 18 mins.I have some Idle tuning to do before I can drive it more.
Once it reaches about 150 or so it starts dying out as you pull up to stops.
I have it commanded to idle at 750rpm.
I think the Idle airflow or VE tables are wrong for the cam.
Yep I was told log 2 cold starts to warm up and use that data to configure the P/N idle, the do 2 in drive and use that data. do 2 warm to running temp under 2000rpm. Then you can go for the VE tuning.start with the idle tuning (Base Running Airflow) in park and drive from dead cold to 210 degrees. It takes 2 days to do that correctly. Alice took 14 minutes to go from 42 degrees to 210. Clifford (a basically stock truck) took 18 mins.
after you get that info, youll need to do VE tuning. without a wide band it takes about 30 mins or so to do everything under 4k rpms.
after that you have to do MAF tuning, also about 30 mins.
all of this is done under 4k rpms because it cant hit PE mode at all..this of course is without a wideband telling your AFR.
Once maf is done, then you need to recheck BRA and VE.
That should get your commanded idle to work as its supposed to. BUT, the surging and or dying at 'stops' is throttle cracker. you will need to add some air. There is no formula, this is trial and error.
This will get you up and running well. But anything that commands PE will be a guess, as o2s turn off and the computer relies on what's stored to give you fuel at full power.
So, without a wideband in the exhaust to show AFRs, you could be lean, rich, no one knows, because you're running off whatever GM has programmed for the vehicle the PCM came from.
You can dial in your cruise, stop light to stop light action, and everything under 4k rpms to be perfect. Then get it to a dyno and have your WOT and everything else tuned. Or by a wideband, and dial it in your self.