S-10 Forum banner

1 - 17 of 17 Posts

·
Loves the boost.
Joined
·
145 Posts
according to research and friends' results... for some odd reason the 98+ 2.2's take a little better to aftermarket components and N/A it's fairly cheaply possible to get about 40 hp over our wimpy 120 stock and more importantly we can tickle the 200 lbs/ft torq point with headers and computer stuff which eats our 140 stock alive.... that's what i've seen... feel free to call bs on me if ya want, but i'm not saying we can work miracles without boost
 

·
Store bought ain't custom
Joined
·
516 Posts
Do you mean stock? Isn't that something like low 90s to the wheels? supposed to be 120 and the engine.
 

·
Registered Abuser
Joined
·
2,375 Posts
imconfused said:
Do you mean stock? Isn't that something like low 90s to the wheels? supposed to be 120 and the engine.
96 at the rear wheels


I g-teched mine at 133 rwhp but those things are inaccurate.
 

·
Registered Abuser
Joined
·
2,375 Posts
burke_24 said:
GM claims that the 98 w/ the 2.2 comes stock w/ 120horse w/ 140ft lbs of torque
thats at the flywheel, not the rear tires
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
920 Posts
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
393 Posts
Im glad my snowmobiles puts out 140hp.....at least i have something fast
 

·
UAH By-product
Joined
·
1,092 Posts
Cavvy is probably geared better than our trucks. Plus aerodynamics. Plus a different drivetrain. You'd have to look at more than just horsepower to tell which is faster.

Brad
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
920 Posts
wellsheit said:
Cavvy is probably geared better than our trucks. Plus aerodynamics. Plus a different drivetrain. You'd have to look at more than just horsepower to tell which is faster.

Brad
plus alot less weight
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top