S-10 Forum banner

Understanding Excursion

10K views 11 replies 9 participants last post by  beandip 
#1 · (Edited)
There's a new page entry added:

Understanding Excursion


DevilDriver said:
It's been a while since I've put anything meaningful together, so it's time for another fun technical article! Excursion is a large contributor to high output in any driver on the market. Typically, larger excursion (seen visually as how far the cone moves in and out) means more sonic output. However, with excursion come challenges.
 
#5 ·
Well done man!,

Is there a way to use the back EMF of the system as a shock absorber of sorts to help save the speaker?

Last what of the magnetic pole was 10" long and the voice coil was 2" that way it could travel 8" without ever leaving the magnetic field?

Also What if the surround was removed and a Teflon style piston ring was used and polished cylinder wall. as well as a uniform spring return.

Ok little of topic but If you have a 12" driver with 12" of excursion capabilities would this be better or worse for you SPL? I would think worse for the time it would take to traverse this distance,.
 
#6 ·
DJDAudio said:
Well done man!,

Is there a way to use the back EMF of the system as a shock absorber of sorts to help save the speaker?

Last what of the magnetic pole was 10" long and the voice coil was 2" that way it could travel 8" without ever leaving the magnetic field?

Also What if the surround was removed and a Teflon style piston ring was used and polished cylinder wall. as well as a uniform spring return.

Ok little of topic but If you have a 12" driver with 12" of excursion capabilities would this be better or worse for you SPL? I would think worse for the time it would take to traverse this distance,.
Well, the first problem with back EMF is that it causes substantial second order harmonic distortion. We want to keep EMF and eddy currents to a minimum.

With a long gap, short coil (LGSC or in this case, underhung) design, there are a few inherent issues. First problem is that production would be very very expensive. With a short coil, BL will drop very quickly as it moves towards the outer limits of the gap. The flux density and saturation would fall well short of our goals as well; these designs are typically very inefficient (in terms of actual flux used) and, as such, not as highly sought after, particularly considering the production costs. Yes, LGSC is capable of lower distortion in some regards (inductance is wonderfully low and there is less flux modulation until you reach the outer limits of the gap) but the cost of producing a driver like we are suggesting here is extremely expensive. Machining aside, the cost of raw materials would be quite high.

Surround changes are interesting to note. A surround is an important part of the suspension, but the spider is very very critical. The Arachnid from Adire Audio is actually a very ingenious step in this direction. HERE is a good thread on distortion generated from suspension non-linearities which also touches on underhung vs Adire's XBL^2 gap technology (US Patent 7,039,213)

In terms of raw SPL (from an engineering standpoint), massive excursion in a sealed enclosure is the way to go. There are a few basic issues with this so far, the first being availability. Right now, there are absolutely no stock parts to create anything near this level of excursion; it would have to be extremely custom and extremely expensive (Adire's Parthenon as well as Richard Clark and David Navonne's giant sub are two of very very few subs that are capable of doing well and are also extraordinarily expensive). Secondly, subwoofer drivers are highly inefficient (typically converting ~3% of input electrical power into acoustic output) and, thus, we would have extremely large power demands.

High spl is currently attributed to subs with large BL (and BL^2/Re) that are used in a bass reflex enclosure, as the use of the out of phase port causes it to be much more efficient than a sealed enclosure while still not requiring the large amount of room required by any 4th or higher order bandpass enclosure.

Hope that addressed some of your questions; I know you always have lots ;)

Neil
 
#7 ·
DevilDriver said:
Well, the first problem with back EMF is that it causes substantial second order harmonic distortion. We want to keep EMF and eddy currents to a minimum.

With a long gap, short coil (LGSC or in this case, underhung) design, there are a few inherent issues. First problem is that production would be very very expensive. With a short coil, BL will drop very quickly as it moves towards the outer limits of the gap. The flux density and saturation would fall well short of our goals as well; these designs are typically very inefficient (in terms of actual flux used) and, as such, not as highly sought after, particularly considering the production costs. Yes, LGSC is capable of lower distortion in some regards (inductance is wonderfully low and there is less flux modulation until you reach the outer limits of the gap) but the cost of producing a driver like we are suggesting here is extremely expensive. Machining aside, the cost of raw materials would be quite high.

Surround changes are interesting to note. A surround is an important part of the suspension, but the spider is very very critical. The Arachnid from Adire Audio is actually a very ingenious step in this direction. HERE is a good thread on distortion generated from suspension non-linearities which also touches on underhung vs Adire's XBL^2 gap technology (US Patent 7,039,213)

In terms of raw SPL (from an engineering standpoint), massive excursion in a sealed enclosure is the way to go. There are a few basic issues with this so far, the first being availability. Right now, there are absolutely no stock parts to create anything near this level of excursion; it would have to be extremely custom and extremely expensive (Adire's Parthenon as well as Richard Clark and David Navonne's giant sub are two of very very few subs that are capable of doing well and are also extraordinarily expensive). Secondly, subwoofer drivers are highly inefficient (typically converting ~3% of input electrical power into acoustic output) and, thus, we would have extremely large power demands.

High spl is currently attributed to subs with large BL (and BL^2/Re) that are used in a bass reflex enclosure, as the use of the out of phase port causes it to be much more efficient than a sealed enclosure while still not requiring the large amount of room required by any 4th or higher order bandpass enclosure.

Hope that addressed some of your questions; I know you always have lots ;)

Neil
Thanks man you do know a damn lot :tup: to you,

and you did answer all my questions and thanks for the link!
 
#12 ·
this is like the 8th time i have read this article, it never gets old :)
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top