Say goodbye to S10forum.com

[Criticalbeatdown95s]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dozer600

You're 29! Do you think it would be a problem visiting an NC-17 site or would your parents block your intrawebs?

Whole thing is pretty ****ed though

LOL i'm sure one of my girlfriends would hahahaha jealous bitches they are

[lowbotie]

ya no i new obama was trouble i mean the people just elected a president thst wont salute the american flag i new that basterd was trouble but any how a movie that just come out kinda reminds me on big brother and i would have to say that that movie is eagle eye dont get me wrong it was a good movie but it is sad but true they are always watching.........

[98SS]

OK, wake up people. I dislike the hell out of Obama also, but this is yet another example of sheeple being fooled into thinking he's doing something he's not.

There are plenty of other things to attack Obama on and not make yourself look stupid.

[lownick]

the sky could be falling too.....

[PunkDime99]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

This is alot of speculation and jumping the gun because it's feels good for scared people to fufill their expectations of Obama ideas with predictions from foriegn online news sources about what's going on in the U.S., rather than possibly try to focus on how their could make American better despite someone being elected that they didn't vote for. As opposed to buying guns and getting all "I'm leaving the country right now" which of course for 99.99% of people is just someone spouting off shit and complaining but not doing shit to actually help anyone or anything.

This shit goes into the news all the time, I remember when e-mails first came out the post office wanted to tax every e-mail 5 cents. It's not going to happen, you can't censor the entire internet, as stated before.

But if you guys like rabble-rousing and taking some speculation and ideas and claiming the the entire world's going to hell, go for it, I think it's pretty funny to watch people bitch about things that haven't happened yet and probably won't. Personally I'll avoid jumping on the dumbass wagon and I'll yell wolf when I see one.

very well said man. i agree with you 100%

[millertime21]

Quote: Originally Posted by 83blazer28

Shit with Obama as president the mexicans are going to try and leave the US

LOL

[gibsittinlow]

LOL wow this thread is overflowing with ignorance... I think its funny that people want to attack and blame Obama for something that most likely wont happen. I bet the same ones attacking believe that our current commander and chief has done aa outstanding job these past 8 yrs!!!

[gibsittinlow]

Quote: Originally Posted by lowbotie

ya no i new obama was trouble i mean the people just elected a president thst wont salute the american flag i new that basterd was trouble but any how a movie that just come out kinda reminds me on big brother and i would have to say that that movie is eagle eye dont get me wrong it was a good movie but it is sad but true they are always watching.........

Man are you serious? Do you think that he would have been a Senator as long as he was if he didnt salute the flag? He would been gone a long time ago. He already has one strike against him why add another!

[Chris0nllyn]

bah, i doubt it would happen


im just waiting for BO to F up, then we can point fingers and say, "you voted for him"....if we do it know itll be some kind of hate crime

[gibsittinlow]

So I guess the people who didnt vote for GW can point the finger at you huh.

[TobyTheSandwich]

Quote: Originally Posted by gibsittinlow

LOL wow this thread is overflowing with ignorance... I think its funny that people want to attack and blame Obama for something that most likely wont happen. I bet the same ones attacking believe that our current commander and chief has done aa outstanding job these past 8 yrs!!!

And i'm glad you have the freedom to say that. I know people who were overseas and such and supported Bush.

Bush hasn't done the best job but he also put the country into a position where they pretty much voted for anyone who wasn't a republican. A lot of Obama's shtick has been "I'm black! vote for me for change!" It hasn't really been as forthcoming about it. But it's been kind of underneath it all. Not to mention I'm sure it looks great on him that Black Panthers were outside polling places. Not a big deal though.

I don't exactly like him. But he's done some things that make me have a little respect for him and I'll see how he does. But I'm not pleased about his racist wife, and minister. Nor am I exactly happy about him taking more of my money to pay for people who are too lazy to work.



YEAHHHHHHHHH

[lowbotie]

look at his childhood his father is from over there and he was brought up muslem if you serch you will find it that he wont salut the flag

[Grohe]

I don't think the creator of the internet, Al Gore, would approve......

LOL

[SoloSDN]

Quote: Originally Posted by lowbotie

look at his childhood his father is from over there and he was brought up muslem if you serch you will find it that he wont salut the flag

over where? Last i heard Kenya wasnt a "muslim" country.


the ignorance or some people annoys the hell out of me.

[DigitalSoCal]

Looks, for at least the time being, that things are moving in the opposite direction

Quote: Originally Posted by slashdot.org

"Electronista is reporting that Kevin Martin, Chairman of the FCC, has dropped the content filtering provisions from the proposal for free wireless broadband service, according to an interview with Ars Technica. Previous drafts of the plan required protection methods to prevent users from accessing objectionable content, such as pornography. 'I'm saying if this is a problem for people, let's take it away,' Martin said. The proposal has received criticism and opposition from a variety of groups including the Bush administration, wireless companies, and consumer interest organizations. T-Mobile has argued that communicating data on the allocated frequency bands will cause interference and quality degradation. Civil liberties groups argue that the FCC would overstep its authority and violate the Constitution."

[lowbotie]

i bet there will be a hit out on him be fore his 4 years is up

[Chris0nllyn]

Quote: Originally Posted by gibsittinlow

So I guess the people who didnt vote for GW can point the finger at you huh.

i never said i like bush....

i dont like anyone

[lowbotie]

i dont like were this country is headed we as people are slowly looseing are rights and before you know it we wont have any at all and i hope that i aint alive to see that

[loudnlownoma]

Quote: Originally Posted by DigitalSoCal

Looks, for at least the time being, that things are moving in the opposite direction

That looks to be about the free wireless connection that was brought up a while back, as part of the auction of whatever frequencies. That isn't about the article this thread is about.

As far as this, I'm with others that these things come out like every day about how it's going to be controlled more and more, and the Internet is still whatever it wants to be. I'll wait and see how it pans out, but I don't expect it to change much.

[gibsittinlow]

Quote: Originally Posted by TobyTheSandwich

And i'm glad you have the freedom to say that. I know people who were overseas and such and supported Bush.

Bush hasn't done the best job but he also put the country into a position where they pretty much voted for anyone who wasn't a republican. A lot of Obama's shtick has been "I'm black! vote for me for change!" It hasn't really been as forthcoming about it. But it's been kind of underneath it all. Not to mention I'm sure it looks great on him that Black Panthers were outside polling places. Not a big deal though.

I don't exactly like him. But he's done some things that make me have a little respect for him and I'll see how he does. But I'm not pleased about his racist wife, and minister. Nor am I exactly happy about him taking more of my money to pay for people who are too lazy to work.



YEAHHHHHHHHH

I did a tour in Iraq and yes there are people who stand behind him 100% but there are those who are there wondering why we are there. Honestly what does the U.S. gain from this? Do you know how much is being spent in Iraq while our country is in a recession? Look I personally dont like to discuss politics b/c everyone is entitled to their opinion.

[TobyTheSandwich]

Quote: Originally Posted by gibsittinlow

I did a tour in Iraq and yes there are people who stand behind him 100% but there are those who are there wondering why we are there. Honestly what does the U.S. gain from this? Do you know how much is being spent in Iraq while our country is in a recession? Look I personally dont like to discuss politics b/c everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Well the fact it's one less dictatorship may be one reason we're there. Crazy, i know. And I know alot of money is being spent on the war. The recession isn't the government's fault either. You give out loans to people who can't pay them and you're gonna lose out on your ass. So to blame Bush for the recession is ignorant in itself. We can't exactly just say "Well we don't wanna spend anymore money. Have fun with a ruined country!"

There's many factors in the whole recession.

Politics are just one of those subjects where people like to hear that they're right.

[JollyRojer]

Quote: Originally Posted by gibsittinlow

Man are you serious? Do you think that he would have been a Senator as long as he was if he didnt salute the flag? He would been gone a long time ago. He already has one strike against him why add another!

way to disprove is argument with nothing, hes been a senator because he has money and has the ability to speak to the public, thats it.

they cant censor it.

[Squeek]

Quote: Originally Posted by layinrocker96

over where? Last i heard Kenya wasnt a "muslim" country.


the ignorance or some people annoys the hell out of me.

what's it matter if kenya is a muslim country or not? Amerika is considered by many to be a "christian" country and there are lot of people who believe in other things than God.

There are to many igorant people out there that only voted cause he is black (even thoug he is half white too)
anyways with the internet thing... the internet isn't an american thing, and really can't be controled.

i mean how can you really put a control over it? only way to control it is to shut down the american internet providers

[scrubz]

Quote: Originally Posted by Ease

Wouldn't that just mean the site would be rated R? Or NC17 or something? Hah.

If you can buy porn you should be able to talk about S10's...

[badmatt]

ban everybody under 18?
hahaha j/k

[TobyTheSandwich]

Quote: Originally Posted by Squeek

There are to many igorant people out there that only voted cause he is black (even thoug he is half white too)

I voted for him cause he makes it rain

[Joker Relentless]

Quote: Originally Posted by Squeek

anyways with the internet thing... the internet isn't an american thing, and really can't be controled.

i mean how can you really put a control over it? only way to control it is to shut down the american internet providers

Sure it can be controlled. From a house hold perspective to a national one, you have parental controls on your PC to block certain websites, office buildings block certain sites on their servers, some communities have ISP's block porn for their entire area, and if you look at IWasTaken.Com, Australia is in the process of trying to put together a way to monitor and control the web in the whole country. Now, how can it not be controlled?

[Joker Relentless]

Quote: Originally Posted by TobyTheSandwich

I voted for him cause he makes it rain

[Deepskyy]

Considering some of this story has already made its way to such MSM outlets as Foxnews...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,473127,00.html

Quote:

Britain’s Culture Secretary Andy Burnham says he is pushing for new standards of decency to be applied to the Web and says giving film-style ratings to individual Web sites is a possibility, London’s Daily Telegraph reports.

Describing the Internet as a ‘quite a dangerous place,’ Burnham told the Daily Telegraph he is planning to negotiate with President-elect Obama’s incoming administration to draw up new international rules for English language Web sites.

Those could include the possibility of introducing age ratings for Web sites.

“This is an area that is really now coming into full focus,” Burnnham told the Daily Telegraph.

Though such plans would likely be subject to criticism, Burnham said there is some online content ‘that should just not be available to be viewed.’

“This is not a campaign against free speech, far from it; it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake when it involves harm to other people,” he told the Daily Telegraph. “We have got to get better at defining where the public interest lies and being clear about it.”

Burnham said his goal is for internet providers to offer ‘child-safe’ Web services.

“I think there is definitely a case for clearer standards online,” he told the Daily Telegraph. “More ability for parents to understand if their child is on a site, what standards it is operating to. What are the protections that are in place?”

Those of you who are sitting around with your heads in the sand need to wake up. Between this, the fairness doctrine, the TARP legislation, an attempt to make the Auto Industry fall under an "industrial policy"... The Government is erroding freedom bit by bit, this wouldn't actually be that hard to sneak in to other legislation.

[Squeek]

Quote: Originally Posted by Joker Relentless

Sure it can be controlled. From a house hold perspective to a national one, you have parental controls on your PC to block certain websites, office buildings block certain sites on their servers, some communities have ISP's block porn for their entire area, and if you look at IWasTaken.Com, Australia is in the process of trying to put together a way to monitor and control the web in the whole country. Now, how can it not be controlled?

i wasn't talking about not being controlled on a house hold or company level. if parents would wake up and be parents, and not let the tv and internet be a babysiter then we would probably wouldn't have this problem.

I'm not sure how they are going to monitor a whole countries internet unless all the access is though one big block of severs that has been blocked for this and that.

but the problem with that is if it's on a rating system (say like our movie rating) how are they going to control how another country rate theirs?

i.e. say in the U.S. the Playboy web site gets an X rating and can't be viewed. but France has a website JUST like it but they don't have a rating system, or to them it's not offensive so it gets a much lower rating. how are they going to block that?

[Joker Relentless]

Quote: Originally Posted by Squeek

i wasn't talking about not being controlled on a house hold or company level. if parents would wake up and be parents, and not let the tv and internet be a babysiter then we would probably wouldn't have this problem.

I'm not sure how they are going to monitor a whole countries internet unless all the access is though one big block of severs that has been blocked for this and that.

but the problem with that is if it's on a rating system (say like our movie rating) how are they going to control how another country rate theirs?

i.e. say in the U.S. the Playboy web site gets an X rating and can't be viewed. but France has a website JUST like it but they don't have a rating system, or to them it's not offensive so it gets a much lower rating. how are they going to block that?

I was just giving you an example from the lowest level to the nationwide level because you said it couldn't be controlled. You're right about nation to nation and how hard it would be, but that doesn't mean that they wouldn't try.

Check out the below link to see an example of possible internet control.

http://www.iwastaken.com/forum/inter...lters-364.html

[Gearstix]

F*ck I hate this world.
I just hope Canada doesn't come up with some crafty shit like this.
I still want to access S10F, annoy the HAMB,.... whats next, they block google?
Next thing you know the hippies are going to limit how much we can drive ... watch out people with a fuel injection system that is computerized!

[comics22]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

This is alot of speculation and jumping the gun because it's feels good for scared people to fufill their expectations of Obama ideas with predictions from foriegn online news sources about what's going on in the U.S., rather than possibly try to focus on how their could make American better despite someone being elected that they didn't vote for. As opposed to buying guns and getting all "I'm leaving the country right now" which of course for 99.99% of people is just someone spouting off shit and complaining but not doing shit to actually help anyone or anything.

This shit goes into the news all the time, I remember when e-mails first came out the post office wanted to tax every e-mail 5 cents. It's not going to happen, you can't censor the entire internet, as stated before.

But if you guys like rabble-rousing and taking some speculation and ideas and claiming the the entire world's going to hell, go for it, I think it's pretty funny to watch people bitch about things that haven't happened yet and probably won't. Personally I'll avoid jumping on the dumbass wagon and I'll yell wolf when I see one.

yea no shit, look at Napster in the late 90's and look at all the magical sites and stuff we have now to get way more than just music. cant police anything when it comes to a worldwide network...

sure can pout ratings or whatever but really if the kid wants to view it thier gonna see it! (how many of you when you were little saw a r rated or pg 13 movie without your parents knowing it?)

good ol media tryin to scare the idiots again...blowing things that dont seem too bad way out of proportion making them sound like the end of the world as we know it.

and if they really arent well it will probably be unbanned lifted/whatever within a year anyways if not there will be ways around it, theres always ways around stuff (look at the cracked i phones, game systems, anonymous browsing to get around blockers, etc)

really it doesnt sound anything worse than a vchip for your computer, guess what? you can turn off vchips! not like your stuck watching pbs only when u buy a new tv....

[SteveHH]

I think I just had a panic attack...

WHere is my bottle of valium whererere!!!!


AAAGHHHHHHHHHHHH

[SteveHH]

Could we simply not use existing OTR technology like in instant messages, just adapted to this site?

[Ragged97]

Whatever happened to FREE SPEECH?

**** OBama bIn LAden

[ducttapeandziptie]

Quote: Originally Posted by specter692000

Just one big problem with all that crap. The gov has tried this before back when the net went public, but realized that there is no possible way to do that, it will never happen. the net is the one place that no matter how hard they try they can't monitor/police the entire net. Took a class in mass media law, teacher told us that this could never happen.

Even if it were to happen with a mass collaboration between govt, isp's, sysadmins, whoever, whats to stop people from building "alternate" internet(s). Ever improving wireless technologies will open up entire new worlds of possibilities.

[jtcfanof3]

If they bring back the fairness doctrin,we have a real problem,because it wouldnt surprise me if they dont try and filter the net,China does it,Obama and the Dems wants everyone to love us,so filtering out our free speech too other countries by filtering our internet is just one step in total control.
Now I'm not a black helicopter guy,but its no surprise the government wants to filter out free speech,matter fact they already did with the McCain/Feingold bill:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biparti...ign_Reform_Act
Sadlly,we Americans are to week kneed and soft spined that we'll never have another Boston Tea party,which IMO needs to happen,this is our Governement and I'm sick of Senators like Barney Frank who think government money is his $$ and that its his to throw around.We have a complete lack of accountability in this country,all be it with government and parenting.
I was so pissed at Thanksgiving watching football,the NFL has some project going on about child hood obesity,IMO,parents need to get off their ass limit the kids TV/computer time,send em outside and throw the(insert sport ball here)around,but the problem is parents are the typical American,lazy and wants things spoon fed too them.I meen look at the housing market,what kind of dumbass thinks that just because you can get a loan for a $500,000 house while making $50,000 a year its a good thing to do,I meen come on!
Sorry for my ramblings..............

[JollyRojer]

Nah man its not just a rant you make a good point, and a good amount of people i know feel the same way, it makes me mad as hell to watch the government throw around money like its theirs.

This year in newhampshire we had an older couple named the browns who hole'd up in there ranch in newhampshire because the government said they owed hundreds of thousands in backed income taxes....


sombody point to me where in the consititution it says that i should be paying an income tax to fund the government that strives to take over and controll everything i do. the browns movement has started a more then 2000+ person militia here in newhamphire and im proud to say in march i myself will be signing the militia petition. heres one of the articles from last summer incase anyone is interested. The marshalls for anyone to lazy to read were reported SHOOTING at innocent people around the browns house hold, and tazering and handcuffing anyone who got within 100 yards of the browns house.

http://www3.whdh.com/news/articles/local/BO54448/

"I am a United States Constitution Ranger for real. I have more law enforcement authority and lawful jurisdiction than any of these law enforcement agencies do. Hello. We are officers of honor. ... We protect your rights, your guarantees of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness," he said. "They're conducting sedition and treason.

[jtcfanof3]

"The constituition was written very precisly to restrain the power and force of government and to protect the liberties of each and everyone of us."
Ron Paul

[JollyRojer]

Quote: Originally Posted by jtcfanof3

"The constituition was written very precisly to restrain the power and force of government and to protect the liberties of each and everyone of us."
Ron Paul

amen brother, and also my candidate for '09 i went to 3 of the rallys here in NH and even donated a good bit

[Chris0nllyn]

thats all good and dandy and i agree with 90% of you in here





but, on a serious note......what the hell can we do?
i mean politics are a mofo, they already caught the governor in illinois trying to sell obamas seat....whos to say coruption is more widespread?

i just wanna know what the general public can do about this? it just seems like you need money and power to get some "change"

[JollyRojer]

Quote: Originally Posted by Chris0nllyn

thats all good and dandy and i agree with 90% of you in here





but, on a serious note......what the hell can we do?
i mean politics are a mofo, they already caught the governor in illinois trying to sell obamas seat....whos to say coruption is more widespread?

i just wanna know what the general public can do about this? it just seems like you need money and power to get some "change"

you do, or a gun and a group of people also with guns ready to do whatever if takes to make the change. Like JTC said this union needs to have another boston tea party of the modern day proportion the problem is as he said theres a very good chance its never going to happen and the general public is going to continue struggling to get by, with there jew raised media and foreign affairs squabbling around like a bunch of farm fed chickens.

[The Master]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

This is alot of speculation

Speculation that includes loading up his cabinet with radicals that are for more censorship and have that proven track record?

yep, speculation...

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

and jumping the gun because it's feels good for scared people to fufill their expectations of Obama ideas

And again here we sit with you you making bold claims with only your sense of self worth backing it up.

When he has shown what he is capable of with his pathetic attempt at creating a new type of group that never once existed prior to any president elect...(which technically he was never even that UNTIL the Electoral College voted)...just so he could hold his press confrences and show us all how great he is.

Obama's ideas have been put into play by him. How small or large you want to make them is up to you, but the MSMs want to cover only what they want to cover. I know...tough to figure out.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

with predictions from foriegn online news sources about what's going on in the U.S.,

More like news that the MSM in the US will not cover. Isn't it odd that your fabled great MSM sources in the US are now doing a cover their asses roll with Obama?

If not then why are they now doing stories that are warning we barely know him?

Facts are this. Most Obama supporters are anti Bush.

Facts are this. Obama supporters listened to MSM and outside news sources when everything was negative about Bush and dismissed any positive news source about Bush

Facts are this. Obama supporters now are not listening to outside news sources because their Messiah can not do wrong.

Facts are this. Outside sources (not many MSM sources in the US) are now warning everyone about Obama and his future issues that are rearing their head. Obama supporters do not want to hear their messiah could do wrong....Closed eye survivorship does not work.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

rather than possibly try to focus on how their could make American better despite someone being elected that they didn't vote for.

Now this is really effing funny. An Anti-Bush psychotic telling us that we should focus on how Obama could make things better.

Now that is really amusing. Pathetic, but amusing.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

As opposed to buying guns and getting all "I'm leaving the country right now" which of course for 99.99% of people is just someone spouting off shit and complaining but not doing shit to actually help anyone or anything.

Now you resort to name calling and making fun of the people that rather not have him as president. BUT we are all supposed to be nice nice with each other. What is worse is that when Bush was over popular and it was "cool" to be against him, those that were against him made sure that we all knew how they were going to leave the country if he was re-elected.

Now those that spoke this are saying the very things that they were upset about. Sounds like a double standard. They get upset when others said this and NOW they are saying it. Another pathetic move on their parts.

The most interesting thing is that I have seen far less outcry of those wanting to leave the US now that Obama was elected than when the left wind nutjobs were crying about it.

Now we have you making comment about how there are those buying their guns. It is ironic that people are so bad for this and are only doing this because obama was elected.

When the MSMs are comparing Obama to Clinton.
When the MSMs show us Obama's plan to ban guns.

Now we are getting news stories from your very own MSMs stating the use of troops in the US against and for the populace. Why would people not want to be armed. The govt is breaking the laws it is supposed to enforce leaving the populace in a bind. Defend yourself or become one of the sheep.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

This shit goes into the news all the time, I remember when e-mails first came out the post office wanted to tax every e-mail 5 cents. It's not going to happen, you can't censor the entire internet, as stated before.

There are ways, but they are very technical. It could be done. No matter how you want to claim it could not be. Some of us know how. Some of us also know how we could beat the system, but there are not many that can do the things the few can do.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

But if you guys like rabble-rousing and taking some speculation and ideas and claiming the the entire world's going to hell, go for it, I think it's pretty funny to watch people bitch about things that haven't happened yet and probably won't.

Sorta like how you lwnj's cried about how satanic Bush was. Ironic the pot is calling the kettle black here.

Quote: Originally Posted by Daveman2

Personally I'll avoid jumping on the dumbass wagon and I'll yell wolf when I see one.

And you can be one of the sheep that finds out it is too late when you finally realize the ignorance you live by.

Cheers.

[JollyRojer]

well there you go, haha im nervous ur gonna brake down my posts next all joking aside youve made a good point about the obama supporters, every time i even hint at an educated debate on the up and coming policies they shut down into there own little ball like some sort of caterpillar and refuse to listen to anything you have to say even if its just to offer a rebutle.


now im not saying all obama supporters but, a friend of mine rights political articles in washington for mr obama and between him and some of his supporter friends ive had more then ample opportunties to argue with them and they all show the exact same, turtle tendancies.


i guess im with chris looking for suggestions on how the general public can help make a change here. other then point out that theres no law saying in any way shape or form i should be paying an income tax but every week i do, and every week they allocate my hard earned wages to political blackholes.

[The Master]

Quote: Originally Posted by 98SS

OK, wake up people. I dislike the hell out of Obama also, but this is yet another example of sheeple being fooled into thinking he's doing something he's not.

There are plenty of other things to attack Obama on and not make yourself look stupid.

Funny, you can say this but it can be done.

Look at what they are trying in AU.

There are only a few lines that go into the country. They can shut down sites they deem as unsavory if they really wanted to.

No matter how you "think" it can not be, it actually can at the root servers. Entries into the root servers could be removed causing you the inability to access a site over time. It is a bit more complicated than this, but i dumbed it down to the short answer. AND yes there can be pirate root servers set up to bypass, but these too could be shut down.

[The Master]

Quote: Originally Posted by gibsittinlow

Man are you serious? Do you think that he would have been a Senator as long as he was if he didnt salute the flag? He would been gone a long time ago. He already has one strike against him why add another!

You do not have to salute the flag to be elected.

All you need is a good campaign manager. Look at the presidential election.

He was not a sitting Senator for very long. In fact he was sworn in on January 4, 2005. So in a few days he will have been officially a Senator for 4 years. 2 of which he was campaigning for his presidential bid.

He did not even get a chance for re-election into his seat.

sheesh. People just do not understand what they are talking about.

[The Master]

Quote: Originally Posted by gibsittinlow

So I guess the people who didnt vote for GW can point the finger at you huh.

I love how you have to turn this into antibush crap. Typical of the far left nutjobs.

You all cry that we should give obama a chance, yet you are/were the first to attack bush on anything and everything without evidence or support.

I love how this works for the dumbasses out there.

[The Master]

Quote: Originally Posted by Gearstix

F*ck I hate this world.
I just hope Canada doesn't come up with some crafty shit like this.
I still want to access S10F, annoy the HAMB,.... whats next, they block google?

Google actually blocks traffic from areas already.

Quote: Originally Posted by Gearstix

Next thing you know the hippies are going to limit how much we can drive ... watch out people with a fuel injection system that is computerized!

Actually they will just tax you for driving too much.

http://www.iwastaken.com/forum/right...e-tax-378.html

It can happen with current technologies and further expanded with OBDIII coming out.

[The Master]

Quote: Originally Posted by ducttapeandziptie

Even if it were to happen with a mass collaboration between govt, isp's, sysadmins, whoever, whats to stop people from building "alternate" internet(s). Ever improving wireless technologies will open up entire new worlds of possibilities.

With wireless you have the airwaves.

You are correct.


But you have a federal govt that is in control of the airwaves and doles out the licensing and usage guidelines.

Here is the kicker. AT&T and Verizon Wireless already control 75% of the country's total wireless airwaves. This leads us to the Net Neutrality talk and a whole new tangent.

Basically to dumb this down for those..not saying you..that can not follow.

Going wireless would be nice, but the feds own the airwaves...in a sense...and can control what ranges are used for what. You can pirate it, but then you get the off chance that someone knocks on your door with a large collection of guns and a few handcuffs with trucks to take away you and your shit.