Stang GT vert

toslow4u · 04-07-2005, 02:23 AM

whats with these 94-98 gt stang verts pulling up to me and reving???? i have a kid i graduated with im me and was like ill walk your shit pile in a race... i was like ya whats done to the rustang???? he was like completely stock plus a saleen body kit. i was like well i dont know about your car but 98 stangs stock run 15.7ish stock so it will be a good race cuz i went 15.8 last week with a 30 mph head wind so we'll see whats up.

so i ask him what he is doing saturday, he was like hanging out with the woman and her friends. i was like cool

bring them all out and show them that your car is for the girls and a stock chevy V6 will run ur ass and he signed off.

DAMN MUSTANG OWNERS

MINTSICK · 04-07-2005, 09:21 AM

98 GT's do not run 15.7's stock, more like high 14's stock so chances are you're going to get your ass handed to you.

***stepasyd*** · 04-07-2005, 09:35 AM

don't make a ass out of yourself....

Derrick71 · 04-07-2005, 09:40 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by sdime98

don't make a ass out of yourself....

he already did

***stepasyd*** · 04-07-2005, 09:41 AM

scrubz · 04-07-2005, 09:42 AM

mmmm.....ima go with the american sports car on this one. but good luck

toslow4u · 04-07-2005, 12:31 PM

well i dont know but check your guys stats stock 98 gt VERTS run 15.7 stock and this kid has a steel cobra hood and a full body kit. and he just got it and it is his first stick.

so i dont know about me making an ass out of my self since a 97 vert gt and i ran he had and exhaust and we where pretty damn close

toslow4u · 04-07-2005, 12:34 PM

http://www.car-stats.com/stats/shows...tsgivenid.aspx

0-60:6.9
Transmission: Manual1/4 Mile:15.7
1/4 Speed:88

MINTSICK · 04-07-2005, 01:34 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by toslow4u

http://www.car-stats.com/stats/shows...tsgivenid.aspx

0-60:6.9
Transmission: Manual1/4 Mile:15.7
1/4 Speed:88

Must be with grandma granny shifting with 300lbs worth of groceries in the trunk

jimmything08 · 04-07-2005, 01:37 PM

IS HE TALKING ABOUT VERT?

***stepasyd*** · 04-07-2005, 01:45 PM

convertable...

Slow2.2S10 · 04-07-2005, 01:53 PM

save the embarrasment. personally, i don't know why people rev when they see a low rider truck. i'm not into lowriders but i have no problem with them. the other day as soon as i got my new muffler put on, i was on the phone telling one of my friends about it and revving to let him NOT hear it and some asshole in a older f250 with pipes starts reving at me. i was like wtf? but as the mustang goes, dont' race any 5speed stang. you will be embarrassed. as autos go, lol just run and laugh in your rear view.

jimmything08 · 04-07-2005, 02:08 PM

is a lowrider? I dont drive a lowrider... I drive a mini.

***stepasyd*** · 04-07-2005, 02:17 PM

Slow2.2S10 · 04-07-2005, 02:18 PM

stfu, whatever MINI

jimmything08 · 04-07-2005, 02:27 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Slow2.2S10

stfu, whatever MINI

Get it right and we wont have a problem.. You dont see any chain steering wheels, 13 inch daytons or troll fur and suede in my ride now do you?

MINTSICK · 04-07-2005, 03:36 PM

Oh who really cares, lowrider, mini.....I just call em trucks.

jimmything08 · 04-07-2005, 03:42 PM

to that.. Except it's not a lowrider

Grinch78 · 04-07-2005, 03:44 PM

I drive a Sport Truck

BadaSS_Black97 · 04-07-2005, 04:45 PM

convertible stangs are no problem. I beat one at the track... it was a 97 GT convertible 5-spd he ran a 16.1 and i ran like 15.7. Don't get your panties in a bunch just because it has the mustang nameplate.

NineSeven4Door · 04-07-2005, 05:07 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by BadaSS_Black97

convertible stangs are no problem. I beat one at the track... it was a 97 GT convertible 5-spd he ran a 16.1

how bad did his driving skills suck? either that or it was not a GT

Slow2.2S10 · 04-07-2005, 05:16 PM

ok, coming from a previous(future) owner of a mustang the 96-98 poostangs are nothing to sneeze at. IMO the 4.6 is a POS motor comparable to the 2.2 in my truck especially with an automatic transmission. With a 5 speed they are moderately fast, but nothing that can't be beat by a 4.3L s10. Most of the POS kids that drive them have to run spray just to say they have a "fast" car. Good luck to the original post-er and I honestly hope you shame the guy with his 4.6 b/c they are just as bad as the rice community.

Slow2.2S10 · 04-07-2005, 05:19 PM

oh by the way a 4.6 gt stock has only 215 hp and 240 lb-ft torque. compared to your 190/230 or whatever in a similarly weighted vehicle. put a CAI, high flow cat and cat back and you should be running with those big 4.6 boys

toslow4u · 04-07-2005, 07:45 PM

already done. and i am not and never have feared 94-98 stangs. i know i can beat him, just nice to see that everyone is saying and acting like they know what they are talking about and they dont. i know what my truck can do and what a stang can do so well just see when he is behind me.

thanks badass and slow2.2 for bringing something factual to the topic.
we'll see what happens on saturday with his women and all of her friends

zY · 04-07-2005, 07:48 PM

The answer is no.

4.3Xtreme · 04-07-2005, 07:53 PM

my friend in a completly stock 97 GT WALKED me hard core and his tires are bald as crap so hes spinning thru 2nd and i have an 01 4.3 auto and how could you say a GT only has 240 ft/lbs? its more around 270-280ish

***stepasyd*** · 04-07-2005, 10:47 PM

f the bs....just go race and report back

97zq8juiced · 04-07-2005, 11:30 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by sdime98

f the bs....just go race and report back

AND TAPE IT

***stepasyd*** · 04-07-2005, 11:32 PM

yea what he said

Vandal27 · 04-07-2005, 11:41 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Slow2.2S10

ok, coming from a previous(future) owner of a mustang the 96-98 poostangs are nothing to sneeze at. IMO the 4.6 is a POS motor comparable to the 2.2 in my truck especially with an automatic transmission. With a 5 speed they are moderately fast, but nothing that can't be beat by a 4.3L s10. Most of the POS kids that drive them have to run spray just to say they have a "fast" car. Good luck to the original post-er and I honestly hope you shame the guy with his 4.6 b/c they are just as bad as the rice community.

early 4.6s sucked, i remember reading motortrend when they pulled out the 5.0's, a stock 3.8 v6 camaro was running a few tenths faster than the early 4.6 , im not a fan of mustangs but my buddy had a 02gt bone stock and had no problems chewing up the early cobras and older modded 4.6's, still couldnt hang with a lt1, and going after ls1's was like putting a mini cooper in a nascar race

toslow4u · 04-08-2005, 01:10 AM

ya i have to get his bitch ass out now i showed him time slips and showed him that page and now he is like well i am busy this and that. ya the 02 stangs are sick so fun to drive.

1994-1998 Ford Mustang GT
4,605 cc / 225 hp / 286 lb-ft / 3227-3400 lbs / 0-60 mph 6.8 sec

MINTSICK · 04-08-2005, 09:18 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by toslow4u

ya i have to get his bitch ass out now i showed him time slips and showed him that page and now he is like well i am busy this and that. ya the 02 stangs are sick so fun to drive.

1994-1998 Ford Mustang GT
4,605 cc / 225 hp / 286 lb-ft / 3227-3400 lbs / 0-60 mph 6.8 sec

Yes, faster than your truck, you are correct. When your bolt on pickup starts clicking off 6.8 0-60's, let me know.

toslow4u · 04-08-2005, 12:13 PM

well i dont know doesnt really matter about 0-60 in my opion cuz if we race and he runs a 15.7 and i run better then my 15.8 i dunno i guess it will be close right????

i went 15.846@86.15 60' 2.268 and i had a 30mph head wind. a friend with a srt-4 his best was a 13.6 and he had run 13.3's the hole day before. so the wind was affecting everyone

toslow4u · 04-08-2005, 12:13 PM

and we will see tomrrow how slow my truck is when i go to the track again

MINTSICK · 04-08-2005, 01:42 PM

OK well if the stang runs to 60 in 6.8 seconds, easily beating you to 60, then you're telling me the non existent top end power of your stock cammed 4.3 is going to overcome that faster 0-60 of the mustang before the end of the 1/4?

toslow4u · 04-08-2005, 01:49 PM

stock for stock he runs .1 faster. i have intake and exhaust. and i went 15.8 with a 30 mph head wind. so i think if i get a good launch and he does too then we will be right about even. and his car is stock+steel cobra hood and body kit= more weight then stock + girls in his car

but still i dont think i will have a problem staying right next to him

jimmything08 · 04-08-2005, 02:48 PM

No.. You wont.

End of story.

zY · 04-08-2005, 04:09 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by toslow4u

stock for stock he runs .1 faster. i have intake and exhaust. and i went 15.8 with a 30 mph head wind. so i think if i get a good launch and he does too then we will be right about even. and his car is stock+steel cobra hood and body kit= more weight then stock + girls in his car but still i dont think i will have a problem staying right next to him

Stop magazine racing.

GreatWhite00 · 04-08-2005, 04:12 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by toslow4u

stock for stock he runs .1 faster. i have intake and exhaust. and i went 15.8 with a 30 mph head wind. so i think if i get a good launch and he does too then we will be right about even. and his car is stock+steel cobra hood and body kit= more weight then stock + girls in his car but still i dont think i will have a problem staying right next to him

I doubt it. Maybe if he had a carbon fiber hood he would be running low 9's.

Grinch78 · 04-08-2005, 05:49 PM

This is straight from a Mustang forum.

Quote:

Also about beating the older GTs, look at these numbers below:

05 v6 - 210HP/235TQ

98 GT - 225HP/290TQ
97 GT - 225HP/290TQ
96 GT - 215HP/285TQ
95 GT - 215HP/285TQ
94 GT - 215HP/285TQ

4.3Xtreme · 04-08-2005, 07:45 PM

i really dont think youll win but race and report back

bagged4life2 · 04-08-2005, 07:52 PM

whats the point of racing 2 vehicles that hardly run faster than a 16?

Grinch78 · 04-08-2005, 09:11 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by x faktr

i really dont think youll win but race and report back

Well technically he really never said he would win. He just said that it would be a good race and that there's a chance he could win. With the guy that he is talking about and how it's his first 5-speed I can see him being able to keep up with the guy.

Slow2.2S10 · 04-08-2005, 10:50 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by bagged4life2

whats the point of racing 2 vehicles that hardly run faster than a 16?

b/c we are CIVICly challenged.

juk · 04-09-2005, 12:40 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by MINTSICK

98 GT's do not run 15.7's stock, more like high 14's stock so chances are you're going to get your ass handed to you.

IF what you say is true Mint, I have broken into the 14s. I beat my friends 96 GT. He had no cats (makes a huge difference when you cut all 6 off), had a shifter, jumped the gun, and had an intake. I was surprised to say the least. I doubt anyone cares, but i thought it was freaking awesome! He hates my truck with a passion, and that just made it worse.

OzzManG149 · 04-09-2005, 01:06 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by MINTSICK

98 GT's do not run 15.7's stock, more like high 14's stock so chances are you're going to get your ass handed to you.

I have a 4.6L Thunderbird that will run a 15.7 Stock and a stock V-6 Thunderbird that will run a 15.03 Stock. And I know from experience that a stock GT is faster than the 4.6L Thunderbird.

graniteguy · 04-09-2005, 11:48 AM

the 4.6 has around 260 HP, not 215. That sounds like an old 5.0 number. The early 4.6 numbers may have been lower but I think that is too low. I could be wrong, it just doesn't sound right.

Kind of a change in Mustangs, but road and track is reporting a 15.1 for the new '05 V6 stang. I am pretty sure it's an automatic they tested. That is pretty good.

zY · 04-09-2005, 04:09 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by juk

IF what you say is true Mint, I have broken into the 14s.

I hate comments like this. Beating someone on the street and then saying oh i guess I run 14s then is just retarded.

juk · 04-09-2005, 05:40 PM

jealous, zygote? I really don't give a rats ass what i run in the 1/4. All i cared about was that i beat a stang. So shoot the flame up your own ass and shut the hell up.

4.3Xtreme · 04-10-2005, 01:58 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by graniteguy

the 4.6 has around 260 HP, not 215. That sounds like an old 5.0 number. The early 4.6 numbers may have been lower but I think that is too low. I could be wrong, it just doesn't sound right.

Kind of a change in Mustangs, but road and track is reporting a 15.1 for the new '05 V6 stang. I am pretty sure it's an automatic they tested. That is pretty good.

i know it sounds unrealistic but its a ford thats honestly the true numbers it puts out only the newer gts put up numbers like that not the older 4.6s its all in the heads

04-07-2005, 02:23 AM	#1
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Stang GT vert whats with these 94-98 gt stang verts pulling up to me and reving???? i have a kid i graduated with im me and was like ill walk your shit pile in a race... i was like ya whats done to the rustang???? he was like completely stock plus a saleen body kit. i was like well i dont know about your car but 98 stangs stock run 15.7ish stock so it will be a good race cuz i went 15.8 last week with a 30 mph head wind so we'll see whats up. so i ask him what he is doing saturday, he was like hanging out with the woman and her friends. i was like cool bring them all out and show them that your car is for the girls and a stock chevy V6 will run ur ass and he signed off. DAMN MUSTANG OWNERS
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 09:21 AM	#2
MINTSICK Gaaoooooo Age: 31 Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,931 Location: Kingston, NH User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert 98 GT's do not run 15.7's stock, more like high 14's stock so chances are you're going to get your ass handed to you.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 09:35 AM	#3
*stepasyd* THE SDIME98 Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51,226 Location: Laurel Hill, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert don't make a ass out of yourself....
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 09:40 AM	#4
Derrick71 alone i break Age: 31 Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,291 Location: Rockwood User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by sdime98 don't make a ass out of yourself.... he already did
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 09:41 AM	#5
*stepasyd* THE SDIME98 Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51,226 Location: Laurel Hill, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 09:42 AM	#6
scrubz 355 member Age: 28 Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 13,215 Location: Charlotte, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert mmmm.....ima go with the american sports car on this one. but good luck
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 12:31 PM	#7
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert well i dont know but check your guys stats stock 98 gt VERTS run 15.7 stock and this kid has a steel cobra hood and a full body kit. and he just got it and it is his first stick. so i dont know about me making an ass out of my self since a 97 vert gt and i ran he had and exhaust and we where pretty damn close
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 12:34 PM	#8
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert http://www.car-stats.com/stats/shows...tsgivenid.aspx 0-60:6.9 Transmission: Manual1/4 Mile:15.7 1/4 Speed:88
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 01:34 PM	#9
MINTSICK Gaaoooooo Age: 31 Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,931 Location: Kingston, NH User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by toslow4u http://www.car-stats.com/stats/shows...tsgivenid.aspx 0-60:6.9 Transmission: Manual1/4 Mile:15.7 1/4 Speed:88 Must be with grandma granny shifting with 300lbs worth of groceries in the trunk
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 01:37 PM	#10
jimmything08 No S-Series... Just a GTO Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 11,225 Location: Indianapolis User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert IS HE TALKING ABOUT VERT?
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 01:45 PM	#11
*stepasyd* THE SDIME98 Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51,226 Location: Laurel Hill, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert convertable...
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 01:53 PM	#12
Slow2.2S10 CHANGE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS Age: 28 Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,221 Location: Brandon, MS User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert save the embarrasment. personally, i don't know why people rev when they see a low rider truck. i'm not into lowriders but i have no problem with them. the other day as soon as i got my new muffler put on, i was on the phone telling one of my friends about it and revving to let him NOT hear it and some asshole in a older f250 with pipes starts reving at me. i was like wtf? but as the mustang goes, dont' race any 5speed stang. you will be embarrassed. as autos go, lol just run and laugh in your rear view.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 02:08 PM	#13
jimmything08 No S-Series... Just a GTO Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 11,225 Location: Indianapolis User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert is a lowrider? I dont drive a lowrider... I drive a mini.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 02:17 PM	#14
*stepasyd* THE SDIME98 Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51,226 Location: Laurel Hill, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 02:18 PM	#15
Slow2.2S10 CHANGE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS Age: 28 Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,221 Location: Brandon, MS User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert stfu, whatever MINI
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 02:27 PM	#16
jimmything08 No S-Series... Just a GTO Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 11,225 Location: Indianapolis User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by Slow2.2S10 stfu, whatever MINI Get it right and we wont have a problem.. You dont see any chain steering wheels, 13 inch daytons or troll fur and suede in my ride now do you?
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 03:36 PM	#17
MINTSICK Gaaoooooo Age: 31 Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,931 Location: Kingston, NH User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Oh who really cares, lowrider, mini.....I just call em trucks.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 03:42 PM	#18
jimmything08 No S-Series... Just a GTO Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 11,225 Location: Indianapolis User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert to that.. Except it's not a lowrider
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 03:44 PM	#19
Grinch78 It worked for Superman Age: 30 Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,019 Location: Tempe, AZ User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert I drive a Sport Truck
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 04:45 PM	#20
BadaSS_Black97 Weeeeeee Age: 30 Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 2,512 Location: Beaverton, Oregon User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert convertible stangs are no problem. I beat one at the track... it was a 97 GT convertible 5-spd he ran a 16.1 and i ran like 15.7. Don't get your panties in a bunch just because it has the mustang nameplate.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 05:07 PM	#21
NineSeven4Door <(o'-'o)> Age: 29 Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 223 Location: Montgomery Alabama User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by BadaSS_Black97 convertible stangs are no problem. I beat one at the track... it was a 97 GT convertible 5-spd he ran a 16.1 how bad did his driving skills suck? either that or it was not a GT
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 05:16 PM	#22
Slow2.2S10 CHANGE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS Age: 28 Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,221 Location: Brandon, MS User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert ok, coming from a previous(future) owner of a mustang the 96-98 poostangs are nothing to sneeze at. IMO the 4.6 is a POS motor comparable to the 2.2 in my truck especially with an automatic transmission. With a 5 speed they are moderately fast, but nothing that can't be beat by a 4.3L s10. Most of the POS kids that drive them have to run spray just to say they have a "fast" car. Good luck to the original post-er and I honestly hope you shame the guy with his 4.6 b/c they are just as bad as the rice community.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 05:19 PM	#23
Slow2.2S10 CHANGE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS Age: 28 Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,221 Location: Brandon, MS User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert oh by the way a 4.6 gt stock has only 215 hp and 240 lb-ft torque. compared to your 190/230 or whatever in a similarly weighted vehicle. put a CAI, high flow cat and cat back and you should be running with those big 4.6 boys
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 07:45 PM	#24
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert already done. and i am not and never have feared 94-98 stangs. i know i can beat him, just nice to see that everyone is saying and acting like they know what they are talking about and they dont. i know what my truck can do and what a stang can do so well just see when he is behind me. thanks badass and slow2.2 for bringing something factual to the topic. we'll see what happens on saturday with his women and all of her friends
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 07:48 PM	#25
zY Registered User Age: 30 Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 13,636 Location: MS User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert The answer is no.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 07:53 PM	#26
4.3Xtreme I'm a huge ass Age: 28 Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 10,798 Location: SE Ohio/ Nashville User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert my friend in a completly stock 97 GT WALKED me hard core and his tires are bald as crap so hes spinning thru 2nd and i have an 01 4.3 auto and how could you say a GT only has 240 ft/lbs? its more around 270-280ish
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 10:47 PM	#27
*stepasyd* THE SDIME98 Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51,226 Location: Laurel Hill, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert f the bs....just go race and report back
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 11:30 PM	#28
97zq8juiced Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 14 Location: User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by sdime98 f the bs....just go race and report back AND TAPE IT
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 11:32 PM	#29
*stepasyd* THE SDIME98 Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51,226 Location: Laurel Hill, NC User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert yea what he said
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-07-2005, 11:41 PM	#30
Vandal27 Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 795 Location: PA User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by Slow2.2S10 ok, coming from a previous(future) owner of a mustang the 96-98 poostangs are nothing to sneeze at. IMO the 4.6 is a POS motor comparable to the 2.2 in my truck especially with an automatic transmission. With a 5 speed they are moderately fast, but nothing that can't be beat by a 4.3L s10. Most of the POS kids that drive them have to run spray just to say they have a "fast" car. Good luck to the original post-er and I honestly hope you shame the guy with his 4.6 b/c they are just as bad as the rice community. early 4.6s sucked, i remember reading motortrend when they pulled out the 5.0's, a stock 3.8 v6 camaro was running a few tenths faster than the early 4.6 , im not a fan of mustangs but my buddy had a 02gt bone stock and had no problems chewing up the early cobras and older modded 4.6's, still couldnt hang with a lt1, and going after ls1's was like putting a mini cooper in a nascar race
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-08-2005, 01:10 AM	#31
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert ya i have to get his bitch ass out now i showed him time slips and showed him that page and now he is like well i am busy this and that. ya the 02 stangs are sick so fun to drive. 1994-1998 Ford Mustang GT 4,605 cc / 225 hp / 286 lb-ft / 3227-3400 lbs / 0-60 mph 6.8 sec
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-08-2005, 09:18 AM	#32
MINTSICK Gaaoooooo Age: 31 Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,931 Location: Kingston, NH User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert Quote: Originally Posted by toslow4u ya i have to get his bitch ass out now i showed him time slips and showed him that page and now he is like well i am busy this and that. ya the 02 stangs are sick so fun to drive. 1994-1998 Ford Mustang GT 4,605 cc / 225 hp / 286 lb-ft / 3227-3400 lbs / 0-60 mph 6.8 sec Yes, faster than your truck, you are correct. When your bolt on pickup starts clicking off 6.8 0-60's, let me know.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-08-2005, 12:13 PM	#33
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert well i dont know doesnt really matter about 0-60 in my opion cuz if we race and he runs a 15.7 and i run better then my 15.8 i dunno i guess it will be close right???? i went 15.846@86.15 60' 2.268 and i had a 30mph head wind. a friend with a srt-4 his best was a 13.6 and he had run 13.3's the hole day before. so the wind was affecting everyone
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-08-2005, 12:13 PM	#34
toslow4u Registered User Age: 27 Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Rapid City, South Dakota User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert and we will see tomrrow how slow my truck is when i go to the track again
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-08-2005, 01:42 PM	#35
MINTSICK Gaaoooooo Age: 31 Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,931 Location: Kingston, NH User is: OffLine	Re: Stang GT vert OK well if the stang runs to 60 in 6.8 seconds, easily beating you to 60, then you're telling me the non existent top end power of your stock cammed 4.3 is going to overcome that faster 0-60 of the mustang before the end of the 1/4?
	[Reply w/Quote]