LS6 Cam Vs. Comp Extreme Cam

s10-den · 04-30-2008, 07:12 PM

what exaust are you using?Without "Good" headers,your pissing in the wind anyways...

lilsonoma · 04-30-2008, 07:31 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by s10-den

what exaust are you using?Without "Good" headers,your pissing in the wind anyways...

I hope ya don't mean the Sandersen's are "good" compared to F-body manifolds. They flow the same except really high up in the 5500-6000 range where the tube design will keep the exhaust gas pulses flowing forward further rather than collecting right after the 4th pipe on the manifolds. Only thing is, the manifolds can be had for $40-50 bucks all day long.

Big96Zr2 · 04-30-2008, 08:06 PM

I have truck manifolds on there now, but I would like to have a set of headers on there at some point....prolly not anytime soon though. my truck isnt built for speed........

s10-den · 05-01-2008, 07:42 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by lilsonoma

I hope ya don't mean the Sandersen's are "good" compared to F-body manifolds. They flow the same except really high up in the 5500-6000 range where the tube design will keep the exhaust gas pulses flowing forward further rather than collecting right after the 4th pipe on the manifolds. Only thing is, the manifolds can be had for $40-50 bucks all day long.

LMAO,Its not rocket science to know that 1 1/2 tubes are "NOT" the best thing going.Im not even going to say anything else.Thats like saying I have a 6 sec. everyday driver.Common sence tells everyone that is 8th miles times,not the 1320.

04-30-2008, 07:12 PM	#51
s10-den takes 2 balls in our game Age: 37 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 4,416 Location: florida User is: OffLine	Re: LS6 Cam Vs. Comp Extreme Cam what exaust are you using?Without "Good" headers,your pissing in the wind anyways...
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-30-2008, 07:31 PM	#52
lilsonoma S-series Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 520 Location: User is: OffLine	Re: LS6 Cam Vs. Comp Extreme Cam Quote: Originally Posted by s10-den what exaust are you using?Without "Good" headers,your pissing in the wind anyways... I hope ya don't mean the Sandersen's are "good" compared to F-body manifolds. They flow the same except really high up in the 5500-6000 range where the tube design will keep the exhaust gas pulses flowing forward further rather than collecting right after the 4th pipe on the manifolds. Only thing is, the manifolds can be had for $40-50 bucks all day long.
	[Reply w/Quote]

04-30-2008, 08:06 PM	#53
Big96Zr2 Registered User Age: 29 Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 126 Location: Jacksonville, FL User is: OffLine	Re: LS6 Cam Vs. Comp Extreme Cam I have truck manifolds on there now, but I would like to have a set of headers on there at some point....prolly not anytime soon though. my truck isnt built for speed........
	[Reply w/Quote]

05-01-2008, 07:42 AM	#54
s10-den takes 2 balls in our game Age: 37 Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 4,416 Location: florida User is: OffLine	Re: LS6 Cam Vs. Comp Extreme Cam Quote: Originally Posted by lilsonoma I hope ya don't mean the Sandersen's are "good" compared to F-body manifolds. They flow the same except really high up in the 5500-6000 range where the tube design will keep the exhaust gas pulses flowing forward further rather than collecting right after the 4th pipe on the manifolds. Only thing is, the manifolds can be had for $40-50 bucks all day long. LMAO,Its not rocket science to know that 1 1/2 tubes are "NOT" the best thing going.Im not even going to say anything else.Thats like saying I have a 6 sec. everyday driver.Common sence tells everyone that is 8th miles times,not the 1320.
	[Reply w/Quote]