|
|
#1 |
|
C-130 Crew Dog
Age: 24
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Little Rock AR. User is: OffLine |
Bags vs. Static drop.
I recently purchased a 2dr 2wd blazer. I love my truck, but it sits way too high. I know I want to drop it but I'm not sure if I want to bag it or just do a static drop. I'm sure this may stir up some serious controversy. I don't want a full blown show truck. I have a 4 year old daughter and I still need the room to hold stuff for vacations and such. I already have my mind set on the xtreme kit and different wheels. Just not sure on whether I want bags or static ride. Just lookn for some pros and cons of both.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
here's my, non-expert, thought on ur question, i would say 2'' drop spindles and a 3'' block in the back, that way u can use the spindle if you do bag it and wont be in to much for the blocks.but that may not be low enough 4 you though, then u could do that plus 1.5-2'' coils and leafs(perhaps used ones from an xtreme). i dont know what ur funds will allow, or if ur skill levels are, if u want to do it your self, but if u have basic knowledge + hand tools i would recommend u start with a basic static yourself, but i am paranoid and dont trust anyone to work on my trucks.
But if u have the funds or think u can do it urself then go for the bags, just know it will bee harder than a pickup b/c u'll probably need to cut the floor and seal it back up b4 u want to drive it, and blazers have a curved frame above the axle which makes the notch harder to make. like i said im not an expert but this is 2 cents so if anyone finds this incorrect go ahead and tell me thanks Nick |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
This is doo doo baby!
Age: 19
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,993
Location: Marrietta/Lawrenceville, GA User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
or have the best of both worlds
bags in the front static in the rear ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
bellcranks no more
Age: 22
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,488
Location: ann arbor, mi User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
static till you figure out that you FOR SURE want bags.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
tuckin' fx4
Age: 20
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,684
Location: western ky User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
This is doo doo baby!
Age: 19
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,993
Location: Marrietta/Lawrenceville, GA User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
tuckin' fx4
Age: 20
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,684
Location: western ky User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
oh haha yeah i didnt see this was in the suv forum
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Canyon Carver
Age: 29
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,852
Location: Columbia, IL User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
Bags are a huge amount of work and money. Not only are you replacing components, you are introducing an electrical and plumbing system into the mix as well. If you're not wanting to go super low, the choice is easy. I looked into building a performance bag set-up a while back. Not something that would lay frame, but something that was adjustable. The amount of work, money, and maintenance largely outweighed the few benefits of it.
Judging by what you said in your post, a static drop sounds right for you. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
C-130 Crew Dog
Age: 24
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Little Rock AR. User is: OffLine |
Re: Bags vs. Static drop.
I think I'm going to go with 2" spindles, 2" coils, ZQ8 leafs and 3" blocks. That should get it low and still keep it functional.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|