| S10Forum is the premier S-Series Site on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! | |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#151 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#152 |
|
bellcranks no more
Age: 20
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,127
Location: ann arbor, mi User is: OffLine ![]() ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#153 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#154 |
|
bellcranks no more
Age: 20
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,127
Location: ann arbor, mi User is: OffLine ![]() ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
![]() after that, im still just learning about race suspension systems, but as its still gonna be my daily truck for a lot longer, im probably gonna ignore all the race sus theory, and go with the bulletproof SD 3link. but i havent decided on the spring/shocks setup yet. |
|
|
|
|
#155 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
yes, its approx. a quarter inch thick. |
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
i love my chevy
Age: 26
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Location: davisburg,mi User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
no update. been busy or something?
|
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
i love my chevy
Age: 26
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Location: davisburg,mi User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Static> Bags
Age: 23
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,555
Location: Cincy User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
Are you really going to weld that bracket to the pumkin housing?
I sure the hell hope not. |
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
Registered dumbass
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,222
Location: North Carolina User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
Could just as well be cast steel, forged iron, etc., but I believe (most likely) it is in fact cast iron. I'm not really positive on all housings to be honest. Last edited by NC4x4 : 12-27-2007 at 12:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
Registered dumbass
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,222
Location: North Carolina User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
For strength reasons you definitely need to read up on the pre- and post-heating needs to weld it. I have seen some ugly cracked drivetrain pieces before due to welding it like usual. At least for the rear anyway, with the assumption that the front is cast steel. |
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
werd. on pre and post heat. i hate welding cast shit and if you dont know, heat up the entire axle. |
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
im way ahead of you guys, i know all about it. the plans include preheat, and post cool, all that. i can say that at least my d44 is cast steel. i did a few test on it to make sure. the rear is cast iron though, so i will still have to arc weld it. and dont worry, im a good welder
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#166 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Registered dumbass
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,222
Location: North Carolina User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
I would go find some pictures that I know I've seen, but I'm going to use the lazy card on this one. |
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Registered User
Age: 34
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 502
Location: Chelsea, OK User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
I just found your build thread. You do very nice work! It's good to see something being built that isn't a hacked up turd! The only thing I wanted to comment on was your decision to put the steering behind the axle, it screws up what I believe is called the "Ackerman angle" and causes the tires to squeal and push badly when turned much past half way to lock in either direction. I've experienced this with my dad's '48 Studebaker when we changed the front axle in it and converted it to rear steer (then changed it right back). It didn't effect driveability at all, it just wouldn't turn very sharp at all and pushed and squealed badly. I didn't know if you had considered this so I just wanted to mention it to possibly prevent a headache down the road.
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
well i think he said his rig is going to be on the trailor alot. i dont know if he is going to run it on the street or not.
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Registered User
Age: 34
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 502
Location: Chelsea, OK User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
Cool, keep the pictures coming!!
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
i totally need to finish this project.
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
you totally do
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
so i think there might be a change of plan for this. i was feeling tonight at work like i should not link it in the front, but run my sfa kit on this truck with leafs instead of that other blazer we have. i figure if im going to be "testing" the kit, may as well be on my truck. also the reason i wanted to 3 link the rear was because the front was going to be 3 linked, now i am thinking i might 4 link it, and maybe develop a 4 link kit in the process. i just hope i can run my axle as close to as far forward as i wanted to with coils in the front. i might not be able to, it it will probably cut my WB down a bit, i was going for 112" before.
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Registered User
Age: 22
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,541
Location: Johnson, Vermont User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
so if you're gonna leaf your white "Blazer" what will happen with the black one?
|
|
|
|
|
#177 |
|
Gyro eatin fool!
Age: 23
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,657
Location: south jersey User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
Updates...now!
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
holy hell.. donahue grave dug his own thread!!! haha.
for the shit you do, wouldnt links be better? look how the front cross member / springs hang down in front of the frame on mine, wouldnt that be bad for rocks? it may kill your approach angle compared to a 3-4link & coils |
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
3 Leaf Fab
Age: 24
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,025
Location: Springfield, OR User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
it will diminish my approach angle considering i was going to have 90* with coils. coils would probably flex better too, but i think i will have enough in that department. i was actually thinking about running leafs in the front because they are more stable that coils, and it tends to work out to where you dont kill your steering linkage quite as much. but i dont think leafs in the front is too much of a hindrance, ive seen quite a few leaved trucks to quite well in the rocks i like. plus, you guys have seen how i drive, this would probably be the best test for my kit, and might make it come out sooner.
the black blazer might be used to make the coil sfa kit using the ford axle. |
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Registered User
Age: 24
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 43
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
Wow, I'm blown away. You seemed pretty excited about the unique ideas you had for this thing. I would think you would want the coils and doubler in the same truck, so you can have one "hardcore" S10, and a somewhat milder one with leaves and stock drivetrain for the testing of the kit. I can see how you'd want to just get the kit going first though. Is there any way you can move yours to the side for now and just bust out the black one real quick? I'd be a little sad to see your dream trail rig die before it came to life. Tim did his SAS in a day right? I think we could bust out the black one pretty easy, I'll help if you need it. Just feed me.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#181 |
|
Registered User
Age: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,331
Location: Reynoldsville User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 89 SFA buildup for rocks
4 12+ hour days. and some change. haha
|
|
|