| S10Forum is the premier S-Series Site on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! | |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
2nd Gen. Fabtech to New AIM
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
ONLY COMPLAINT
Dust shield needs pounding away from rotor tie rod too toed in but adjusted it i did measurement as well Spindle shaft A- 4 3/8 F- 4 1/2 INNER distance top and lower bj A- 5 1/2 F- 5 3/8 OUTER distance low bj to tie rod A- 8 3/8 F- 9 1/2 Brake caliper mount are moved somewhat higher than F Finish the swap,took plenty comparison pics of 2nd gen fabtech to Jan 2008 Aim, quite some difference and measurement Spindle shaft A- 4 1/2 F- 4 3/8 INNER distance upper and lower bj A- 5 1/2 F- 5 3/8 OUTER distance low bj to tie rod A- 8 3/8 F- 9 1/2 Aim brake caliper mount are moved somewhat higher than F and its similar location as stock Aim Caliper mount was better fitting than fabtech bolts to aim dust shield/abs sensor mount are apparently IN between of coarse and fine thread and I have 2 drawers full of fine thread bolt/nut and 1 drawer full of coarse thread bolt/nut only had to get 1 longer bolt to abs sensor and other 2 are fine, blow hammer are used to fit dust shield to make room for rotor and move it away from rotor ONLY complaint, its pigeon toed in TOO much just like other member said, so best to lift truck up off the ground and adjust tie rod before you go in alignment soits better driveaibility. Seeing some pic of ebay spindles, they are just a copy of aim spindle than an actual aim spindle from what I seen on the pic Fabtech is SOMEWHAT beefier than Aim, HOWEVER Aim has more area machined for dust shield fitting basically |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
Thanks to JMew03 for this info
with the lift spindle and removing the brake hose mount on the frame, i stil have good length and longer hose was NOT NEEDED, JMew03 has 97 2wd Blazer with 3" fabtech spindle and 2" lift coil, it still doesnt need the brake length with droop mount not removed, i had it up in air, at full droop, full lock, it still had room and not pulling hose/ripping on either side of turn. Therefore buying longer brake line isnt NEEDED. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
![]() ![]() Flipped the balljoints Balljoints are McQuay-Norris, they are really good and recommended by the s10/sonoma prerunners along with Napa Balljoints |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thats much better than moog, pp, duralast considering theres more than just a boot protection, pics says it all ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,053
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
ya I seen the post at desertDimes.com....................I quess you noticed this thread in the same section:
http://dezertdimes.com/board/index.php?topic=825.0 SteveCan wrote: Hi guys, I've been busy working on the spindle lift on my first gen 1988 S10 that I purchased from Canuck Motorsports. I believe these are Spingtech spindles. MY ADVICE IS TO AVOID THESE SPINDLES AND KITS!!! I had to tap threads into the caliper mounting holes, glad they drilled the holes in the right location! Then correct the wheel alignment toe, there was far too much toe in, I had a pigeon toed truck! At least now I can drive it to the garage to get a wheel alignment. Far too much modifying for a "bolt on kit". I am a mechanical engineering technician with a machine shop, fitter/fabricator background. If a person didn't have this experience, knowledge and tools they may have a real frustrating time and probably end up returning the "kit" for a refund. VERY POOR QUALITY Anyhow here are some photos. More to come as lift progresses, will post in the brakelines section later on with my DOT brakeline solution you know springtech is Aim right? Last edited by 89-S-Dime : 01-25-2008 at 07:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
89-S-Dime
Pics and comments are from me, JMew03 informed me of the stock brakeline doesn't need to be lengthen but remove the brake line mount on the frame, that's what I meant for JMew03, Im familiar with that thread, Im member there as What? and made same post/pic over there, Im sharing it over the S10Forum I had no problem with the 08 Aim spindle and seeing those comparing to other brands, are very similar so I take it its just a copy of a aim spindle but not exact one OR 08 Aim made change of designs because I hadn't had any problems and I posted my comment of it, its not as much as his(the canuck/sprngtech) compared to my Aim so that leads me to believe with picture some difference and problem difference that those companys are just 3rd party design from Aim. Either that or all those spindle are hit and miss |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
That housing is stamped vs. our housing which is forged - forged is MUCH stronger. Also, it has a clamp-on style boot, which is prone to slipping out of the housing causing premature failure. Our's utilizes a snap ring-retained, accordion style boot.Just my humble opinion. Pic for comparison: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
, Not knocking on your balljoints. This is typically used when other store bought(beside Napa) are best to get while Moog goes out easily 3-6times, Duralast just crapped out, I've heard few of your brand breaking out but NOT as much compared to Moog/Duralast. Do you guys have designs without the boot, Id like to see it naked Duralast has similar design of snap ring, but wasnt strong enough and the boot just rip easily ![]() I forgot to post up pics, McQuay Norris also has clamp on with bolts attach to a-arms that does same as snap ring to hold boot in, and its very very very tight lol. You guys do have good products and A LOT sold with good results and a few bad apples, McQuay Norris has yet to have a lot results but just what has been said so far is good result. Keep it up on your products, you guys have excellent line up and well trusted business ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,053
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
I disagree with What on McQuay-Norris being the better Ball Joint....................Napa and McQuay-Norris both make two grades of BJ's
Napa makes a premium grade and makes McQuay-Norris makes the "Extreme" series.......both are very good BJ"s but both have failed me.........In fact I've just replaced my upper BJ's and idler arm on my ZR2 with PowerPerformance parts..........I was using McQuay-Norris Extreme BJ's on my ZR2 till I ripped the pin right out of upper BJ on the passanger side of my truck. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
Dezertdimes.com However for store bought, more longer from McQuay/Napa than Moog, Duralast, some may not want to wait 1-2days for balljoints to arrive, unless being smart and order ahead HOWEVER, no one has put the PP on there s10/sonoma prerunner yet, so no result as is for the s10/sonoma prerunner. But we will agree that best money spent will be the Uniball, That will be my next balljoint after this. But now having you and Brian using the PP, that will show the result of PP on the 4wheelers, at least its better than Moog Also another company to look into, which i believe 2 members from dd.com using this and happy with it as well Red Baron is one of them and his comment about them http://stockcarproducts.com/susp7a.htm Last edited by What? : 01-26-2008 at 07:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
Last edited by Power Performance : 01-27-2008 at 04:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Age: 22
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 895
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
i beat the shit out of my power performance upper joints and theyve never let me down. instead of having upper problems, i now have to replace the lowers with 5 k on them. not power performance. i cant say nothing bad bout em yet...
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
I talked with him, he threw it out and long gone by now, also along with idler arm, i was looking forward to look at it too. What brand was it you had to replaced with 5k on it? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
What I RECOMMEND for the budget wise, the new Aim lift spindle from Aim themself would be a ok choice. HOWEVER Id still recommend Fabtech ESPECIALLY 2nd gen-present if you can get them for under $350 shipped, new or used(besure to check the spindle shaft thread, my fabtech thread got ****ed. Its easy to swap considering only need remove tie rod, tire, caliper, rotor, pads, abs sensor, remove upper arm(keep jack on the lower arm), swap spindle and reverse process.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 130
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
I thank you guys with your threads. You really bring to light a bunch of things I will be asking in the future and looking for answers on. You all are awesome! I think because of this specific thres i am going to go with Fabtech spindles. I talked with you 89-S-Dime on a thread I started on springs or spindles. Thanks for the info man. When I put the spindles on my truck, with my 2" body lift that puts me at about 5.5" of heigth. My question is about the rims and tires. Instructions say....and I state this for safety reasons because this truck is my go to work truck....and I quote:
"This Fabtech spindle lift is designed for use with a 30" diameter tire mounted on a 15x7 wheel. When running larger than OEM tires, wheel back space must NOT exceed 3.75-inches. Larger tires are not recommended for use with OEM wheels with this kit!" Can I go up to 31's? What about the OEM rims, or the tire diameter? I have 16x8 factory rims, and nice too, will it work? I plan on getting some cheap rock crawlers? What do you guys think? A lot of questions I know! Thanks for your help! |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
however if you just want spindle/coil lift only then look into 5664 moog coil, flip balljoint and call it a day no need for longer brake line or front shocks(with 2" or less, it'll be just bringing droop closer to max droop on stock arms) then look into lifting rear shackles through www.3leaffab.com can't go wrong with that, however depending on how much lift with shackles you may need or not for longer shocks, which all you need to do is buy zr2 rear shocks, same as stock but longer |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,053
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
WHAT?,
I've done my research on S10 lift spindles and this thread should be a sticky! Last edited by 89-S-Dime : 08-15-2008 at 01:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,053
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 130
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
This is the problem...I can't find the 5664 moog coils for my year pickup. 98' 2WD SLS 2.2 Sonoma. Where can I look? I've tried a search but all the forums pop up with that word in them and thats it. I think I am going to stick to a 3.5 inch spindle and 31x10.5x15. With 2 on the body and 3.5 on the suspension, i think I should be good.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered Staff
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,527
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,053
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
![]() Mood coil spring Part#5664 http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductD...artNumber=5664 McQuay-Norris Coil Springs Part Number: FCS5664Shttp://www.partsamerica.com/ProductD...ber=FCS56 64S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ![]() do a search of 5664 and it will come up MOOG Part # 5664 -$56.79 |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
I Rather Be Wheelin'
Age: 25
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,461
Location: The Woods, VT User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: Aim VS Fabtech VS Stock Spindle
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 130
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
I checked the PartsAmercia.com store and they noly have Moog springs for my truck from 94-96 Sonoma, and mine is a 98 Sonoma, geez, no glory here with these springs.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 130
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,053
Location: User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
is out cruisin...
Age: 21
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,439
Location: Sanford, NC User is: OffLine ![]() |
Re: 2wd Lift Aim VS Fabtech and Balljoint Info
i just read on the AIM website that the spindles are made for only standard offset rims and can break if a larger offset wheel is bolted on...so that means that if i offset my new rims a little more to stick further for a wider stance that they will break? thats kinda weak aint it? does anybody have wider offset rims on their AIM spindles?
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
|