|
|
#101 |
|
I cant win for loosing.
Age: 27
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,226
Location: Bogalusa, LA User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
So with all this being said would it be safe to say that:
On the stock injectors you should not run boost in a 4.3? Possibly by overworking the injectors to 105% isnt there a chance that they would fail at any given time? If you added an inline booster pump, as well as an intercooler and meth inj, increase the timing just a tad, run cooler plugs, and high octane pump gas, do you think that it would break the 300hp mark? And finally does anyone know what the main contributor in driveline loss of hp would be? Edit: sorry for the 32 type-o it was late... ![]() Last edited by PhatBoy : 01-05-2006 at 01:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Registered User
Age: 30
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,250
Location: lake forest User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
Last edited by gutlesswonder : 01-05-2006 at 03:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
It WAS a Blazer
Age: 33
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 521
Location: Baltimore, Maryland User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
He has an additional disadvantage in driveline losses. All I had was a home made CAI, EFan, EGR Mod, T/B mod, regular 3.42 rear, And Bigger than stock 265/70/15's. I also had no cooling fan as the were set up for fwd sport compacts that day, and they realized the fan was on the other side of the bay after my truck was strapped in. Run 18 was w/ vehicle speed sensor on. Run 19 was w/ Vehicle speed sensor off. (Damned torque managment )Last edited by Lenny95NeoN : 01-05-2006 at 07:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
It WAS a Blazer
Age: 33
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 521
Location: Baltimore, Maryland User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Registered User
Age: 30
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,250
Location: lake forest User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
Last edited by gutlesswonder : 01-05-2006 at 07:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Registered User
Age: 27
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 235
Location: cincinnati, ohio User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
no hard felings, stop by at nats and say hi im sure TRTTURBO knows this im putting it out to help others reading a pump would only help if your having a pressure drop at WOT. otherwise the only real fix is to add an FMU to increase the fuel pressure beyond what the stocker is set at |
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
It WAS a Blazer
Age: 33
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 521
Location: Baltimore, Maryland User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
TURBOS SUCK
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 737
Location: Puerto Rico User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
Guys I'm really glad this post has become one of exchanging ideas and info instead of cutting each others throats.My project is 95% complete.Because of my distrust in fmu's,
I've invested in a meth/alky kit to make sure I can reach the estimated 300hp that the Mach turbo kit is suppose to put out. As you guys know I also have a converted Edelbrock intake and a bigger turbo on the shelf. Sam and TJ will be my sources for the basic TunerCat mods that will help me start tunning.I'm thinking of investing in a TurboLink scantool to keep tabs on the performance. Keep the flame burnning. PEACE>Tony |
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Registered User
Age: 30
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,250
Location: lake forest User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
I cant win for loosing.
Age: 27
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,226
Location: Bogalusa, LA User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
So what are the best options for fueling in the 4.3 without going to the 2114 mani project?
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
Dangerous
Age: 27
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,658
Location: California User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
I cant win for loosing.
Age: 27
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,226
Location: Bogalusa, LA User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
So would I use the high impedance or low impedance kit, anyone use one of these systems yet?
Are they worth the money. |
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Dangerous
Age: 27
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,658
Location: California User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
BlackX has use this on his 2.2 with his wynjammer with great success. There are many others as well. Do a search on google you will find many others. Its a great product in my eyes. |
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Un-Blown Fake ZQ8
Age: 34
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,455
Location: Los Angeles User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
Increasing injector pulsewidth is essentially the same thing as using an fmu. There is a limit to what the injector can achieve either way and using the Multec II injectors you're even more limited. The blazer in this thread is awfully close to that limit so achieving anymore hp will be practically impossible w/o upgrading the manifold/injectors. You could try an extra injector but Ive always been wary of them since the 4.3 manifold isnt really intended to flow atomized fuel.
The ONLY way to do this right is with a 2114 manifold converted to EFI using bigger injectors programmed with either LS1 edit or tunercat. |
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
I cant win for loosing.
Age: 27
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,226
Location: Bogalusa, LA User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
Or you can use an extra injector controller that will control 6 additional injectors, and do some fab work to the stock intake so each injector sprays right into each cyls air path. Basically like doing the 2114 without the 2114, ya know.
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Registered User
Age: 27
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 235
Location: cincinnati, ohio User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Registered User
Age: 49
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
I have tried to contact gutless about his turbo setups but haven't gotten a reply from him. thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Banned
Age: 21
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,270
Location: SW FL User is: OffLine |
Re: Remote turbo.
with walbro fuel pump, and FMU you dont think you could hit 240whp? |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|