|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#51 |
|
Registered User
Age: 26
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
my question is are the two 86 posts connected, or both going to dif grounds? or connected and somehow grounded also. . .
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Registered User
Age: 29
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 167
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I picked one of these fans up at the wrecker yesterday for $45 Canadian (pretty much inline with what you guys pay, and no shipping this way). When we tested it, it blows like CRAZY, I'm very impressed. It is a three wire setup, so does that mean it's a dual speed? I don't have Air conditioning, and I have a 4.3 TBI, so how would you reccommend me wire this? Still like a dual speed or just use one of the speeds if possible (If it even is a dual speed, I never tested that, I just see 3 wires). I'll be going to the parts store early next week and want to buy all the parts for the swap. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
BTW, yes, it's a dual speed fan |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Registered User
Age: 29
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 167
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Sounds like a good plan Rlith. My only question is, what kind of thermostats are those in the pics? I'm familiar with the ones that thread into the intake or the water neck for an electric fan, but not the style you show there (unless I'm just looking at the picture wrong). Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
your opinion sucks
Age: 60
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,890
Location: NW IL User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
What's the recommended wire guage for the dual fan set-up?
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Registered User
Age: 25
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
ok so i have a dual fan setup that i got from the junk yard n i am going to wire it up for dual speed, but the only thing i am not shure of is where i can find th A/C wire.
BTW i have a 89 , 4.3 it that helps thnx |
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
I AM CANADIAN
Age: 27
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,616
Location: Ont. Canada User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
rlith- How would you set this up for 2 temps?, wiring is no prob for me but I dont see how if the HI setting gets to a set temp (say 225), the fan will come on but when does the Hi setting shut off? what temp? it would have to shut off below 225 because that temp switch is set for 225, is there a type of "shut off setting" with these temp switches? or does the low setting come on once it gets under 225?
Last edited by tt85_GM; 06-14-2007 at 10:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Director
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,796
Location: ArizonaS10.com User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I did a dual efan for my 2.2L since it will be blown so 2nd fan comes in handy for extra cooling
however on my 4.3L I'll put in 3.8L mustang fan in, and almost 100% fit, now just need bracket and wiring kit, time 2 dump clutch fan |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Chip Chipperson
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,836
Location: usa User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
man i need to move somewhere you can get the taurus fan cheaper around here at the junk yard they want 65-80 for the ford fan and 100-125 for the ls1.i want to do this mod so bad but i aint payin that much for a used fan.
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
I AM CANADIAN
Age: 27
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,616
Location: Ont. Canada User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
How much of a MPG gain are we talking here?, is this really worth the time to put one in?, what are your outcomes with this e-fan swap?
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
You can actually get by with smaller wire than 12 gauge in a lot of cases. There's nothing wrong with using 12 gauge but it isn't necessary in some cases.
Here is a chart. Credit for this goes to Tessco: http://www.tessco.com Note that if you use longer runs, it's better to use a larger size. The chart shows this also. ![]() For a amp hog Taurus e-fan, a larger gauge is recommended. For Flex-a-lite or Perma-cool, (13 and 9 amps, respectively) a small wire can definitely be used with no adverse effects. Last edited by nater006; 06-29-2007 at 03:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
MPG gain and payoff time:
Consider a 1MPG gain, going from 20-21MPG. 20 MPG: Gas: $3/gallon Cost per mile: $0.1500/mile 21 MPG: Gas: $3/gallon Cost per mile: $0.1429/mile Difference per mile: $0.0071/mile If the e-fan costs $100, it will take 14,084 miles to recoup your costs in mileage increases alone. ($100 / $0.0071 = 14,084). (p.s., I noticed a 1-2MPG increase with mine. 14K miles is nothing.) |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Most of the salvage fans I found around here were higher, and by the time you pick up a $20 thermostat kit, mounting hardware, possibly wiring, and whatever else, it can turn into a larger investment. Different people go different routes, and $100 was a good number to work with.
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I'm very much for this mod. By far it was the best bang for the buck for my truck. Greatly reduces the noise and was a noticeable MPG increase.
There's always somebody throwing around the fuel economy vs. modification cost argument. The reality is in the math. ~14,100 miles is *nothing* for most of us. |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Insane Network Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,965
Location: Pittsburgh, PA. User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
the youngest has been
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,952
Location: FLORISSANT MO User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
using the schematic rilth posted for the dual speed fan, low comes on with the thermostatic switch, and high comes on when i turn on the AC. but the high speed wont come on unless low has already been triggered. just an fyi your ac WILL NOT work unless there is airflow over the condenser. ask me how i know
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Some empirical evidence from the Hayden/Imperial manufacturer, if anybody cares. Taken right from their 2007 e-fan catalog.
![]() Poor CFM at a poor amperage. Perma-cool and Flex-a-lite both pull 2800+ CFM at 9 and 14 amps, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Chip Chipperson
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,836
Location: usa User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
ok,i really need some help,i just got done putting in a taurus fan in my blazer,first thing,i havent been able to get the fan to come on from the thermostat,and second,when i turn the ac on the high side kidks on but the truck wants to stutter and shut off,sometimes it will keep running and sometimes it will cut off,also a few times when the ac was on the truck idled at 1500 or rpms so i know thats not right.if anyone can help me please let me know,iguess i used the right diagram and everything(i hope)and i a hope i put the thermostat probe in the right place,and is there another thermostat that i ccan use that doesnt go through the radiator,i just dont trust the one i got,it also didnt come with instructions so i hope i hooked it up right.sorry about the long post but i need help bad, i have to have the truck back on the road monday morning.thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Chip Chipperson
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,836
Location: usa User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
also i couldnt get the 1N4007 diode,i could only get the 1n4005 diode,is this ok?and also the thermostat i have has 2 hook ups on the controller does it matter which wire goes to what or should they go to certain places?
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Chip Chipperson
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,836
Location: usa User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
[/QUOTE]ok never mind me and a friend figured it out,we used this wiring diagram but we made some changes to it.hopefully i can get it up tomorrow to help anyone that had the same problems as me. |
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 318
Location: I'm right here! User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Wouldn't the Flex-A-Lite control module work for these Taurus fans???
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Director
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,796
Location: ArizonaS10.com User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I got clutch fan off, needless to say, notice the power back very nice and driving around without efan with 180* and as long under 70*, my temp do not move higher than it did with clutch fan, it jsut warm engine in a minute versus 5min with clutch fan and mantains at all mph speed. It idles same temp, but earlier the day(80*) it was 1 line higher at idle then back normal, for winter being I'll just hook up with manual switch with my 3.8L mustang fan seing it doesn't really get over 180* without efan
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 318
Location: I'm right here! User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I'm going to simply my life after using cheap Flex-A-Lite fans where the fan itself keeps coming loose on the shaft (defective)
I'm going to get the 11in Spal eFan setup and use the Flex-A-Lite controller which is easy to wire up and works great. |
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
ntheworks!
Age: 32
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 91
Location: west fort worth, texas! User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
my taurus e-fan pulls 38 amps!!!!!!but it really BLOWS too
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Hayden and Imperial fans are light duty with bogus air flow ratings. You can tell just by the amp draw of the motor that they will not move much air. The best aftermarket electric fans are produced by Spal (www.spalusa.com). They are the only aftermarket company I know of to produce a fan comparable to the Taurus unit. Notice how they give airflow ratings using static pressure not just free flow numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
The Perma-cool runs at 9 amps but pulls 2950 cfm, and the Flex-a-Lite Black Magic is 13-14 amps I believe, at 2800 cfm. My comments (and, the table above, in this same post) are that Hayden/Imperial are very poor quality for the amp draw. A high flow fan does not need to draw an excessive amount of amps. For many/most applications, the Flex-a-Lite or Perma-cool is more than sufficient cooling. I elected for the much lower amp draw (compared to Taurus fans) for lesser CFM, and it has done an exceptional job of keeping my truck running cool. EDIT: interestingly enough, I looked at those Spal fans and they do not deliver a high CFM. Better than Imperial/Hayden, but lower than Perma-cool or Flex-a-lite. Of course, comparing free airflow to restricted airflow will reduce the others' numbers a bit... but, not that much! Last edited by nater006; 11-19-2007 at 02:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Don't want to argue, just pointing out the facts as I and several others I know have witnessed. You would be very suprised to know the actual pressure drop across a good quality 2 row radiator. Of course there are many other factors that come into play such as fin count, core thickness and the material of which the radiator is manufactured. I'm not trying to call any particular manufactures product garbage, every product has its place. I can tell you that we use these fans on big blocks ranging up to 557 cubic inches in Florida and Texas and they're able to do the job. With that being said I don't think a 4.3 would be any problem.
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
(The Hayden/Imperial chart above gives a better example what I'm talking about with free air flow vs restricted. There is definitely a reduction, but as you can see by the table, it's not like you chop it really far down. Last edited by nater006; 11-20-2007 at 12:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 71
Location: NorCal User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Just a couple questions.... 1) what type/size wiring do I use? I was going to use 10 guage for the 12v constant and 16 guage for the rest is that OK?
2) I'm using the stock alternator (85a I think), am I gonna need to upgrade this first if I use the Taurus fan? |
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 71
Location: NorCal User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
^^^ Anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
loco hombre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,461
Location: Michigan User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
![]() For the Taurus fan, you'd want to do at least 10 gauge for the power and ground wires. The activator wire for the relay doesn't need to be a large gauge as it carries a very minor amount of signal. I posted a chart earlier in this post that deals with wire gauge to amperage. Meeting & exceeding is good. Getting smaller than the recommended is very bad. As for the alternator upgrade, I'd definitely say yes. At idle, which is where your fan is likely going to kick on, is where your alternator is putting out a low wattage - nowhere near the 85 the alternator is rated at. The Taurus fan can draw 25+ amps easily on high. (There are posts here and in other forums about people blowing 30 amp fuses on fan startup) |
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Registered User
Age: 43
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 49
Location: Belleville, IL User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I just did the Taurus efan mod myself in my BlaZeR2.
Here is my write-up and photos I'm only running low speed right now off of a 30/40 amp controller. I am considering using this wiring diagram to run the low and high with. Comments welcome. |
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
I AM CANADIAN
Age: 27
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,616
Location: Ont. Canada User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
wow nice swap pages man^^
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Registered User
Age: 43
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 49
Location: Belleville, IL User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
![]() Been working on the wiring diagram and I am not going with the one I posted above. You can read this thread of what I'm going to go with: http://www.s10forum.com/forum/f62/ta...4/#post5225571 |
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Registered User
Age: 63
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 17
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I am running the Taurus fan setup in my 1967 Chevy Nova. I run a 350+ hp 327. I have the low speed fan running off of a Hayden switch that is set at 195. The high speed side is connect thru a manual switch. The only time I use the high speed fan is to quickly cool the car down below 160 when I park the thing.
The low speed side of the fan works just fine. Cruising well over 50 miles at a time. |
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Registered User
Age: 43
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 49
Location: Belleville, IL User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
Sounds good! These fans move a ton of air. Wish I would have gone the Taurus efan route the first time and saved me a year's worth of frustration trying to stay cool. I've been running mine on low for the past month and its working great. But I'll what that high speed available come summer time when my AC is on in case it does run hot.
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Daily Driver
Age: 29
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 219
Location: Nor ☆ Cal User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Registered (Ab) User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,131
Location: League City, TX (Houston) User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
It's only 1/2" deep!! That's not going to flow much air through the area covered by the shroud!
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Daily Driver
Age: 29
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 219
Location: Nor ☆ Cal User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
so nogo?
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Registered (Ab) User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,131
Location: League City, TX (Houston) User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
I would go with no shroud rather than using one that shallow!
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
Location: User is: OffLine |
Re: Hayden/Imperial vs Taurus E-Fans: My Review
is this mod aimed more for manuals? or would it be beneficial for autos too?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|