camel hump heads vs. vortec heads - S-10 Forum

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 Old 02-28-2005, 08:34 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
ReedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 281

User is: ReedZ is offline
camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

If I had a choice of one or the other, which would be the better set of heads to get? What specific reasons would one be better than the other?
BTW, these are going on a 350 sbc


84 S10 Long Box, 2.8L V6 R.I.P., V8 powered now!
ReedZ is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 23 Old 02-28-2005, 08:35 PM
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
 
1fast4by's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Age: 33
Posts: 17,848

User is: 1fast4by is offline
Send a message via AIM to 1fast4by
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Vortec, hand fcukin down



F L O W


Double humps will flow about 190 cfm, maybe less. Vortecs out of the box will flow bout 230-235

"The police cannot protect the citizen at this stage of our development, and they cannot even protect themselves in many cases. It is up to the private citizen to protect himself and his family, this is not only acceptable, but mandatory."
-Jeff Cooper

Ban gun free zones!
1fast4by is offline  
post #3 of 23 Old 02-28-2005, 08:52 PM
Registered User
 
s10iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: las vegas
Age: 34
Posts: 114

User is: s10iroc is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

vortec

s10iroc is offline  
post #4 of 23 Old 02-28-2005, 10:02 PM
Registered User
 
Spayer88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Olgesby, Il
Age: 32
Posts: 169

User is: Spayer88 is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Def vortec

1988 S-10 Vortec 350 4-Barrel Edelbroc, California Combo with LED, Shaved and Suicided doors Suicide hood,shaved body lines, totally custom interior, Autometer gauges, Phantom grille, 17 Eagles, etc......

1992 S-10 Extended cab fully loaded 15" Eagles 31's HP Dana 30 + Ford 8.8 16" suspension now 8" due to cops and 3 " body lift. SOLD!!!!!
Spayer88 is offline  
post #5 of 23 Old 02-28-2005, 10:08 PM
tits and tire smoke
 
wllbndthrw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: fort washington md
Age: 28
Posts: 2,623

User is: wllbndthrw is offline
Send a message via AIM to wllbndthrw
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

vortec for sure
wllbndthrw is offline  
post #6 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 12:35 AM
>X<
Crossroads Customs
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baton Rouge Louisiana
Age: 31
Posts: 74

User is: >X< is offline
Send a message via AIM to >X<
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

let me guess, some old fogey hot rodder said

"back in my dey, der was this here guy in town with a camaro with some of dem camel hump heads and it was the fastest car around"

vortec hands down

Sean @ Crossroads Customs
>X< is offline  
post #7 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 11:27 AM
Registered User
 
94badazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: colden, N.Y.
Age: 31
Posts: 2,190

User is: 94badazz is offline
Send a message via AIM to 94badazz
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

i gots the vortec heads... and have heard nothing but good shiot about them... i dunno yet cause my motor is not done yet...

you can get a set of them for kinda cheap on ebay... but look for casting number: L31 / 12558062 , these are the stronger+better casting versus casting number: 10239906. that casting has hardend exhaust seats that kill low and mid valve lift flow.

MA TRUCKITY TRUCK.... COM'ON CLICK ME DAMNIT!

now buying parts for a slick ass 350 swap
94badazz is offline  
post #8 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 12:03 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
ReedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 281

User is: ReedZ is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Thanks for the feedback guys.
Vortec's it will be.
Now i just have to go hunting for a cheap set.

84 S10 Long Box, 2.8L V6 R.I.P., V8 powered now!
ReedZ is offline  
post #9 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 01:01 PM
Registered User
 
blazinred87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Gilbert AZ
Age: 30
Posts: 381

User is: blazinred87 is offline
Send a message via AIM to blazinred87
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Vortecs are already dirt cheap. That's what awsome. My trusty Jegs catalog sells them for $260 a piece assembled. Thats the cheapest you'll find new. Plus they're a bolt on 40 horsepower.

'87 Blazer-- Torch Red/Black two-tone, 17" American Eagle's, lowered 5/4, 2.8.
blazinred87 is offline  
post #10 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 01:06 PM
old skoolin'
 
MetalJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rome, GA
Age: 33
Posts: 525

User is: MetalJunkie is offline
Send a message via MSN to MetalJunkie
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReedZ
Thanks for the feedback guys.
Vortec's it will be.
Now i just have to go hunting for a cheap set.
Shouldn't be hard to do, iron vortecs are pretty friggin cheap new to start with. Camel Humps were decent heads 35 years ago, but now a cheap set of vortecs will stomp em in the dirt.

Where did my S10 go?????
New Project...blown 4.3 powered '82 yota 2wd pickup
MetalJunkie is offline  
post #11 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 09:36 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
ReedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 281

User is: ReedZ is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

$260.00 a piece? I guess that's probably cheap, but seems like a lot.
I'm going to see about getting a used set maybe too. I have budgeted only a few hundred bucks for heads.
Would it be worth checking into getting my regular heads redone? ported, etc.?
I dunno....

84 S10 Long Box, 2.8L V6 R.I.P., V8 powered now!
ReedZ is offline  
post #12 of 23 Old 03-01-2005, 09:44 PM
**** you
 
AssDragginSdime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: from the mean streets of southington, CT
Age: 30
Posts: 9,528

User is: AssDragginSdime is offline
Send a message via AIM to AssDragginSdime Send a message via MSN to AssDragginSdime Send a message via Yahoo to AssDragginSdime
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReedZ
$260.00 a piece? I guess that's probably cheap, but seems like a lot.
I'm going to see about getting a used set maybe too. I have budgeted only a few hundred bucks for heads.
Would it be worth checking into getting my regular heads redone? ported, etc.?
I dunno....
better than paying up toward $1000+ for a different set.l
AssDragginSdime is offline  
post #13 of 23 Old 03-02-2005, 05:12 AM
Getting faster
 
ZZ4Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Akron, Ohio
Age: 35
Posts: 1,220

User is: ZZ4Blazer is offline
Send a message via AIM to ZZ4Blazer
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Stock vortecs wont flow that much, but they do flow better than the camel humps.

Summits got some new, ported ones flow 232@.500 lift, screw in studs, and springs good to .520 lift (stock will only handle .480) $650 for the pair.

Jim 94 Stepside
New v8 combo coming
5/6 drop QA1/hotchkis
ATS tall spindle/14" Z06 brakes
6 speed / 8.5" rear
ZZ4Blazer is offline  
post #14 of 23 Old 03-02-2005, 05:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: o'fallon, il
Age: 30
Posts: 766

User is: nic m is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

I saw those heads your talking about zz4. I think I'm gonna use those on my nova.
nic m is offline  
post #15 of 23 Old 03-02-2005, 06:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OR
Age: 28
Posts: 153

User is: WhiteS-10n' is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

if you were to run vortec heads you have to use a different intake manifold right?

White '98 S-10 4.3L

mods-wynjammer supercharger w/6psi pulley (have a 9si pulley for the track), k&n filter, throttle body mod, flowmaster w/hollowed cat, msd6A ignition box, msd wires, b&m shift improver kit, lowered 3", clarion headunit, infinity reference component set, jl sub, mtx amp, clear corners

1/8 Mile- 9.6 @ 71mph, 2.2 60'
WhiteS-10n' is offline  
post #16 of 23 Old 03-02-2005, 06:37 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
ReedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 281

User is: ReedZ is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Correct.
I think the Edelbrock Super Victor Intake works with them.

84 S10 Long Box, 2.8L V6 R.I.P., V8 powered now!
ReedZ is offline  
post #17 of 23 Old 03-02-2005, 07:14 PM
Getting faster
 
ZZ4Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Akron, Ohio
Age: 35
Posts: 1,220

User is: ZZ4Blazer is offline
Send a message via AIM to ZZ4Blazer
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Most decent intakes you can find, you'll find in a vortec design too. I've got a vortec edelbrock RPM AIR gap intake.

Jim 94 Stepside
New v8 combo coming
5/6 drop QA1/hotchkis
ATS tall spindle/14" Z06 brakes
6 speed / 8.5" rear
ZZ4Blazer is offline  
post #18 of 23 Old 03-03-2005, 03:01 PM
Registered User
 
94badazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: colden, N.Y.
Age: 31
Posts: 2,190

User is: 94badazz is offline
Send a message via AIM to 94badazz
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZZ4Blazer
Most decent intakes you can find, you'll find in a vortec design too. I've got a vortec edelbrock RPM AIR gap intake.
i have the edelbrock air gap manifold too... i gots the polished one... how do you like your top end setup? what carb are ya runnin'?

MA TRUCKITY TRUCK.... COM'ON CLICK ME DAMNIT!

now buying parts for a slick ass 350 swap
94badazz is offline  
post #19 of 23 Old 03-03-2005, 05:45 PM
Getting faster
 
ZZ4Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Akron, Ohio
Age: 35
Posts: 1,220

User is: ZZ4Blazer is offline
Send a message via AIM to ZZ4Blazer
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Well, I dont have vortec heads. I've got the fastburn gm heads. Bigger, and flow better than the vortecs.

But, they do have a vortec intake design. So, my top end isnt really relevant or comparable. But, I do think I've got pretty good topend for the mild cam I've got, LT4 HOT cam.

Jim 94 Stepside
New v8 combo coming
5/6 drop QA1/hotchkis
ATS tall spindle/14" Z06 brakes
6 speed / 8.5" rear
ZZ4Blazer is offline  
post #20 of 23 Old 03-03-2005, 05:49 PM
CHANGE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
 
Slow2.2S10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brandon, MS
Age: 31
Posts: 1,221

User is: Slow2.2S10 is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

vortec is probably the more efficient design, but my friend had a set of camel humps on his 10 sec 408.
Slow2.2S10 is offline  
post #21 of 23 Old 03-07-2005, 01:31 AM
its not pink
 
tensecond_s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: medford oregon
Age: 36
Posts: 144

User is: tensecond_s10 is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReedZ
$260.00 a piece? I guess that's probably cheap, but seems like a lot.
I'm going to see about getting a used set maybe too. I have budgeted only a few hundred bucks for heads.
Would it be worth checking into getting my regular heads redone? ported, etc.?
I dunno....
you should change up your budget a bit and emphasize on the heads. heads are the most important part of an engine. buy some new vortecs and base the rest of the engine around them.

1.58 60' 7.01 @98 1/8th 11.01 @ 122.2 1/4


383 ci 12.0:1 brodix track 1 heads (ported by me) super victor intake (also ported) cam motion solid roller .665int/.626exh lift 267int/273exh dur. @ .050 107lsa crower lifters manley pushrods and titanium retainers comp pro magnum rockers. 1.6int/1.5exh eagle forged crank 6" h-beam rods pioneer sfi balancer and flexplate

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...0/d78df1d3.jpg
tensecond_s10 is offline  
post #22 of 23 Old 03-07-2005, 12:17 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
ReedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 281

User is: ReedZ is offline
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

I hear what you're saying. I guess i just didn't research enough when i decided i'd get some new heads. I really had no idea how much they cost.
My friend has offered me a set of 305 fuel injected heads for free. I believe they are the L31 type if that means anything.
What do you guys think of that option? Should i go with that, or just try to keep saving for the 350 vortec (062's)?
Remember, this is and will continue to be my daily driver.

84 S10 Long Box, 2.8L V6 R.I.P., V8 powered now!
ReedZ is offline  
post #23 of 23 Old 03-07-2005, 12:27 PM
tits and tire smoke
 
wllbndthrw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: fort washington md
Age: 28
Posts: 2,623

User is: wllbndthrw is offline
Send a message via AIM to wllbndthrw
Re: camel hump heads vs. vortec heads

if you only have a few hundred for vortecs dont do it .at $260 each new and needing a intake and rocker arms (you shouldnt need them if you buy a used set) it ends up being past you budget so just stick with camel humps
wllbndthrw is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the S-10 Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome